How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The connecting morphism depends on no choices
Remark
The arrow-theoretic construction of The connecting morphism exists and is unique produces the connecting morphism by a universal property and proves uniqueness at the same time. Once the pullback and pushout are fixed, there is no remaining zig-zag choice whose independence must be checked later.
That is exactly what the universal-property route buys. In an elementwise construction one has to prove that different representatives and different choices of lift lead to the same class. Here the final morphism is already the unique map that makes one displayed square commute.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Lemma VIII.4.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.5, Lemma 12.5.17(1) (standard reference, not scraped)