Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: Literature-sourcedProof: Not suppliedaudited 2026-09-04‡ sources checked 2026-09-04‡ not proved here
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

‡ Recorded, not proved here. This statement is included so the library can refer to it honestly, with a citation to the literature. It is not proved anywhere in this library: the track that would prove it has not been developed here yet.

Exact-sequence additivity of trace and its missing hypotheses

Remark

EGNO Proposition 4.7.5 proves an exact-sequence additivity formula for quantum trace, but it proves it in a multitensor category, not under rigidity alone. Concretely, if a:V→V∨∨ preserves a subobject W⊆V, then the source theorem says

Tr⁡L(a)=Tr⁡L(a∣W)+Tr⁡L(aˉ),

and likewise for right traces, where aˉ is the induced map on V/W.

This page records that theorem exactly as source-backed boundary information and does not widen it to an arbitrary rigid abelian monoidal category.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources