Hausdorff dimension of the graph of the Weierstrass function
Statement
For parameters and with , the classical Weierstrass function is
It is continuous on and, by Hardy's 1916 sharpening of Weierstrass's 1872 example, nowhere differentiable whenever and . Its graph is a compact subset of , and the claim at issue is that its Hausdorff dimension is
a number strictly between and , since gives and gives .
Status: settled in 2018 for integer , and open in general. Shen proved the formula for every integer and every . For non-integer the value of the Hausdorff dimension of the graph remains open. Even in the settled range the result is far out of reach here: it needs Hausdorff measure and dimension, hyperbolic dynamics, and the absolute continuity of an SRB measure on a solenoidal attractor.
Remarks
Not proved in this library. Nothing here rests on the value of this dimension, and no page may cite the formula as established.
What is known, and what would settle the rest. The box-counting dimension of the graph is and has been classical for decades (see Falconer, The Geometry of Fractal Sets); since Hausdorff dimension never exceeds box dimension, the entire difficulty is the lower bound. The successive advances were: Hunt (1998), who proved the formula for the randomly phased variant for almost every phase sequence ; Barański, Bárány and Romanowska (2014), who proved it for integer and above a threshold ; and Shen (2018), who removed the threshold and covered every integer and every , by proving that the SRB measure of the associated solenoidal attractor is absolutely continuous. Ren and Shen (2021) then generalised the formula from to an arbitrary real analytic periodic , as a dichotomy: for integer and , either is real analytic or its graph has Hausdorff dimension . Every one of these results keeps the hypothesis that is an integer. What would settle what remains is the non-integer case, where the associated dynamics is no longer a self-affine expanding map of a circle by an integer degree and the current method does not apply.
Why it matters here. Continuity and nowhere differentiability of a Weierstrass function are in scope for this library and will be proved from the Weierstrass M-test and a direct oscillation estimate. The dimension of the graph is not, and the gap between the two is worth naming: the elementary statement that the curve has no tangent anywhere is a nineteenth-century theorem, while the quantitative statement of how rough it is took until 2018 and is still incomplete. Recording that here keeps the nowhere-differentiability page from implying more than it proves.
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- W. Shen, Hausdorff dimension of the graphs of the classical Weierstrass functions, Mathematische Zeitschrift 289 (2018) 223-266 (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Shen, Hausdorff dimension of the graphs of the classical Weierstrass functions (arXiv:1505.03986) (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Barański, B. Bárány and J. Romanowska, On the dimension of the graph of the classical Weierstrass function (arXiv:1309.3759) (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. Ren and W. Shen, A dichotomy for the Weierstrass-type functions, Inventiones Mathematicae 226 (2021) 1057-1100 (arXiv:2007.04312) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Weierstrass function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)