How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
What the subtraction rule does not say
Remark
The member in The subtraction surrogate is an existence statement, not a canonical difference. The theorem does not assert uniqueness of , does not endow member classes with a binary subtraction law, and does not say anything about an arbitrary morphism applied to .
What it does control is narrower and exactly sufficient for diagram chasing: is killed by , and it is related to and only through morphisms that already kill one of them.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, Theorem VIII.4.3(vi) (standard reference, not scraped)