How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Whitehead torsion is the complete obstruction to finite CW simple homotopy
Statement
A homotopy equivalence of finite CW complexes is simple if and only if in , with basepoint changes transported canonically. This is a statement about finite CW complexes, with no smooth handle or cobordism assertion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homotopy equivalence of finite CW complexes.
Every simple homotopy equivalence has zero Whitehead torsion (Simple homotopy equivalences have zero torsion).
For a cellular , the target inclusion is simple, the mapping cylinder is finite, and its retraction satisfies (The target of a finite cellular mapping cylinder is a simple subcomplex).
A finite connected homotopy-equivalence inclusion with zero torsion admits a finite elementary deformation relative to its source (Zero relative torsion gives a finite relative elementary deformation).
Whitehead torsion is invariant under cellular approximation and under the stated basepoint and cellular-basis choices (Whitehead torsion is independent of all auxiliary choices).
for composable finite CW homotopy equivalences (Composition and based-pair sum formulas for Whitehead torsion).
A map homotopic to a finite composite of elementary expansions, collapses and cellular isomorphisms is simple (Simple homotopy equivalence).
A map with finite CW source is homotopic to a cellular map without any choice principle (Cellular approximation for maps of CW pairs).
Proof
If is simple, [F1] gives on each target component.
Conversely suppose . By [F7] and [F4] replace by a cellular map in its homotopy class; this changes neither its torsion nor whether it is simple. The construction is finite because is finite. Work first on one connected component; a homotopy equivalence bijects the finite component sets.
Form the finite cellular mapping cylinder . Its target inclusion is simple by [F2], so [F1] gives . Since , [F5] yields . Also , whence . The retraction is a homotopy equivalence and induces an isomorphism on Whitehead groups, so .
The source inclusion is a homotopy equivalence of finite connected CW complexes. Apply [F3] to obtain a finite relative elementary deformation from to . Reversing that sequence shows is simple. The target inclusion is also simple, so its inverse retraction is homotopic to the reverse composite of its elementary moves and is simple by [F6]. Thus is simple. Repeat on each of the finitely many components and concatenate their finite move sequences. This proves the reverse implication and the asserted direct-sum statement. ∎
Depends on
- Simple homotopy equivalences have zero torsion
- The target of a finite cellular mapping cylinder is a simple subcomplex
- Zero relative torsion gives a finite relative elementary deformation
- Whitehead torsion is independent of all auxiliary choices
- Composition and based-pair sum formulas for Whitehead torsion
- Simple homotopy equivalence
- Cellular approximation for maps of CW pairs
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cohen, §§8.5 and 22, printed pp.32–33, 72–75 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lück, Theorem 2.21, printed pp.37–38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Casson, Theorem 4.7, printed pp.32–34 (standard reference, not scraped)