Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A nonzero abelian category cannot satisfy both AB5 and AB5*

Statement

If an abelian category satisfies both AB5 and AB5*, then it is the zero category. Equivalently, no nonzero abelian category satisfies both axioms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian category A satisfying both AB5 and AB5*.

[L1]

AB5 and AB5* are the directed-join and decreasing-meet distributivity laws of The axioms AB5 and AB5*.

[L2]

An abelian category has zero objects, kernels, cokernels, and finite biproducts (Abelian category).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2chooseconstruct

Suppose X is a nonzero object. Let S:=∐n≥0X and P:=∏n≥0X, which exist by the AB3 and AB3* parts of [L1]. Let s:S→P be the canonical map. For each n, let Tn≤P be the tail subobject ∏k≥nX. Then (Tn) is decreasing, ⋂nTn=0 because the product projections jointly detect morphisms, and Tn∨im⁡(s)=P because the finite head X⊕n≤S together with the tail generates all of P. Applying AB5* to the family (Tn) and the subobject im⁡(s) gives im⁡(s)=P.

2.1step 1.1L2construct

For each n, let Sn≤S be the finite partial sum X⊕n. The family (Sn) is directed and has join S. Transport the product diagonal δ:X→P across the isomorphism S≅P from step 1.1, and let D≤S be its image. The diagonal is monic because each product projection composed with it is 1X, so D≠0. But for every n one has D∧Sn=0: a map factoring through both D and Sn has zero (n+1)-st coproduct projection because it factors through Sn, while through D that same projection is the factor map itself, so the map is zero.

3.1L1step 2.1contradiction: nonzero object

Applying AB5 to the directed family (Sn) and the fixed subobject D gives D=(⋁nSn)∧D=⋁n(Sn∧D)=0, contradicting step 2.1. Therefore no nonzero object X exists, so A is the zero category.

4.1step 3.1contrapositive: nonzero category∎

Step 3.1 proves that satisfying both AB5 and AB5* forces the category to be zero, which is the contrapositive form of the theorem's second sentence.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources