Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A nonzero abelian category cannot satisfy both AB5 and AB5*

Statement

If an abelian category satisfies both AB5 and AB5*, then it is the zero category. Equivalently, no nonzero abelian category satisfies both axioms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An abelian category A satisfying both AB5 and AB5*.

[L1]

AB5 and AB5* are the directed-join and decreasing-meet distributivity laws of The axioms AB5 and AB5*.

[L2]

An abelian category has zero objects, kernels, cokernels, and finite biproducts (Abelian category).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose X is a nonzero object. Let S:=n0X and P:=n0X, which exist by the AB3 and AB3* parts of [L1]. Let s:SP be the canonical map. For each n, let TnP be the tail subobject knX. Then (Tn) is decreasing, nTn=0 because the product projections jointly detect morphisms, and Tnim(s)=P because the finite head XnS together with the tail generates all of P. Applying AB5* to the family (Tn) and the subobject im(s) gives im(s)=P.

L1L2chooseconstruct
2.1

For each n, let SnS be the finite partial sum Xn. The family (Sn) is directed and has join S. Transport the product diagonal δ:XP across the isomorphism SP from step 1.1, and let DS be its image. The diagonal is monic because each product projection composed with it is 1X, so D0. But for every n one has DSn=0: a map factoring through both D and Sn has zero (n+1)-st coproduct projection because it factors through Sn, while through D that same projection is the factor map itself, so the map is zero.

step 1.1L2construct
3.1

Applying AB5 to the directed family (Sn) and the fixed subobject D gives D=(nSn)D=n(SnD)=0, contradicting step 2.1. Therefore no nonzero object X exists, so A is the zero category.

L1step 2.1contradiction: nonzero object
4.1

Step 3.1 proves that satisfying both AB5 and AB5* forces the category to be zero, which is the contrapositive form of the theorem's second sentence.

step 3.1contrapositive: nonzero category

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources