How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A short exact sequence is a kernel-cokernel pair
Statement
For morphisms in an abelian category, the following are equivalent:
- the sequence is short exact;
- is a kernel of and is a cokernel of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Morphisms and in an abelian category.
A short exact sequence is exact at , , and (Exact sequence and short exact sequence in an abelian category).
Exactness at a node can be tested by the two arrow equalities and (The arrow-theoretic criterion for exactness).
In an abelian category, a morphism is monic exactly when its kernel is zero, and epic exactly when its cokernel is zero (In an abelian category, monic means zero kernel and epic means zero cokernel).
The identity of is a cokernel of , and dually the identity of is a kernel of (The cokernel of the zero map out of the zero object is the target, and dually for kernels).
Exactness at gives both and (Exactness at a node).
Every epimorphism is the cokernel of its kernel (Every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel, and dually every epimorphism is the cokernel of its kernel).
Kernels are monic and cokernels are epic (Every equalizer is a monomorphism, and every coequalizer is an epimorphism).
Proof
Assume the displayed sequence is short exact. Exactness at and [L4] make the arrow criterion [L2] read for a kernel of , so and [L3] makes monic. Dually, exactness at gives , so is epic.
Conversely, assume is a kernel of and is a cokernel of . Then [L7] makes monic and epic, so [L3] gives endpoint exactness. Also , and if is a kernel of while is a cokernel of , then factors through , hence because . Thus [L2] gives exactness at , so the sequence is short exact.
Exactness at gives by [L2]. Since is monic by step 1.1, the factorization is an epi-mono factorization of , so every with factors through . Thus is a kernel of .
The same exactness at , read through the second equality in [L5], identifies with . Because step 1.1 makes epic, [L6] says that itself represents . Hence represents the quotient , which is exactly to say that is a cokernel of .
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 show that short exactness forces to be the kernel of .
Steps 2.2 and 1.2 complete the equivalence.
Depends on
- The arrow-theoretic criterion for exactness
- Exact sequence and short exact sequence in an abelian category
- The kernel of a monomorphism is zero and the cokernel of an epimorphism is zero
- The cokernel of the zero map out of the zero object is the target, and dually for kernels
- In an abelian category, monic means zero kernel and epic means zero cokernel
- Exactness at a node
- Every equalizer is a monomorphism, and every coequalizer is an epimorphism
- Every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel, and dually every epimorphism is the cokernel of its kernel
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.5, Definition 12.5.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David Mehrle, Category Theory, Part III, Remark 7.21 (standard reference, not scraped)