How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Abel means converge in L^p, uniformly, and at Lebesgue points
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Let be one-periodic with .
- If and , then
- If is continuous, then
- If is a Lebesgue point of , then
In particular, for almost every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice and a one-periodic function with .
The Abel means satisfy , so for every and every (Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series).
The Poisson kernels are nonnegative, have integral , and their mass on tends to as (The Poisson kernel on the circle is a positive approximate identity).
At a Lebesgue point, (Lebesgue points and the Lebesgue set of an class).
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, almost every point is a Lebesgue point (Almost every point is a Lebesgue point of a locally integrable function).
Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, is dense in for ( is dense in for ).
Proof
Let be one-periodic and in for some . Using [L1] and the positivity and unit mass in [L2], Jensen's inequality gives Integrating in over shows and hence
Assume now that is continuous, and let . Uniform continuity modulo gives such that whenever . Using [L1] and [L2] exactly as in the Fejer proof yields By [L2], the far term is for all close enough to , uniformly in . Therefore uniformly.
Assume is a Lebesgue point of , and let . By [L3], choose so that Define so for . Pairing and in [L1] gives Set . On , the closed form in [L2] gives , so this interval contributes at most . If and , then on , so [L2] gives The same integration-by-parts estimate as in the Fejer proof shows that contributes at most . Finally, contributes as by [L2]. Hence .
Let and assume . Let . Repeating the construction from the Fejer theorem with [L5], one obtains a continuous one-periodic function such that Then step 1.1 and the uniform convergence of step 1.2 give for all sufficiently close to . Hence in .
Step 1.3 proves the pointwise conclusion at every Lebesgue point, and [L4] therefore gives the almost-everywhere convergence.
Depends on
- Cesaro and Abel means of a Fourier series
- The Poisson kernel on the circle is a positive approximate identity
- Lebesgue points and the Lebesgue set of an $L^1_{loc}$ class
- Almost every point is a Lebesgue point of a locally integrable function
- $C_c(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is dense in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michael E. Taylor, Fourier Analysis, Distributions, and Constant-Coefficient Linear PDE (standard reference, not scraped)