How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Positive age-renewal evolution and L1 data stability
Statement
For Linear age-structured renewal transport problem, let . The solution map is linear and positive, and
If use possibly different nonnegative bounded coefficients and and initial data , put and . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two age-renewal models and the characteristic mild solutions supplied by Characteristic formula and Volterra solution for age renewal transport.
Linear age-structured renewal transport problem: are nonnegative and bounded, the inflow is , and survival is the exponential along an age characteristic.
Characteristic formula and Volterra solution for age renewal transport: each nonnegative initial density has one nonnegative mild solution, given by the characteristic formula and Volterra birth equation.
Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: if with nonnegative continuous and nondecreasing , then .
Proof
For nonnegative initial data, sums and nonnegative scalar multiples of the solutions in [F2] satisfy the corresponding characteristic formulas and renewal equations in [F1]; uniqueness in [F2] therefore makes additive and nonnegatively homogeneous on . For arbitrary real , put , and define . If also with , then , so cone additivity gives . This independence of decomposition gives additivity on , and nonnegative homogeneity together with gives real linearity. The extension obeys the same characteristic formulas and renewal relation by subtraction; it agrees with [F2] on and is positive there.
Integrating the two characteristic branches in [F2] gives . Bounded and continuous permit differentiation under these integrals; using and yields for almost every . Since and , we have .
Integrating the differential inequality in step 1.2 gives . Apply [F3] with and to obtain the asserted bound for nonnegative data. For arbitrary real , positivity and linearity from step 1.1 give almost everywhere. Integrating and applying the nonnegative-data bound proves .
Subtract the two transport equations and write . Along characteristics, its interior forcing is and its inflow forcing is . Taking absolute values in the characteristic integral formula, integrating over age, and using nonnegative survival factors gives , where and .
By step 2.1 applied to , . Thus the nondecreasing function bounds the forcing integral in step 2.2, and [F3] yields the claimed coefficient-and-initial-data stability estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Benoît Perthame, Introduction to Structured Equations in Biology, full lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)