How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An oracle collapses p and np
Statement
For , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Proof
Oracle absorption supplies and . A deterministic oracle computation is a nondeterministic one with no choices, so .
The inclusions form a closed chain, giving equality of all three classes. The same fixed total TQBF language is used throughout; it is not required to belong to P.
Depends on
Used by
- Relativization alone cannot resolve p versus np Corollary
- Relativized separations prove unrelativized separations False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arora–Barak, Computational Complexity, 2007 draft; §3.5 Theorem3.9 and Claim3.8(3), pp70–72; explicit TQBF adaptation. (standard reference, not scraped)