Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Local channel projections are orthogonal idempotents

Statement

Let b,c,a1,…,an be simple objects of a unitary fusion category, with n≥2, and let Tfixed be a fixed parenthesization of b⊗a1⊗⋯⊗an. Equip H=Hom⁡(c,Tfixed) with the split Hom inner product g†h=⟨h,g⟩id⁡c and choose orthonormal split vertex bases in the trees below. Fix 1≤i<n. Let Ai:Tfixed→Tpair be a composite of associators and inverses to a tree fusing ai,ai+1 first, without permuting inputs. Let Fi be the matrix of h↦Ai∘h, with target rows and source columns, and let Πs project onto all pair-first coordinates of simple pair output s, retaining every multiplicity index. Define Pi,s:=Fi−1ΠsFi, extending the repeated-charge construction of Local anyonic channel projector to these arbitrary simple site charges. Then (Pi,s)s is pairwise orthogonal, self-adjoint, and idempotent, and its sum over all simple outputs of ai⊗ai+1 is the identity on H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The unitary fusion category, finite ordered simple inputs, split Hom space, orthonormal vertex bases, and adjacent pair specified in the Statement.

[F1]

Local anyonic channel projector defines the repeated-charge case by Pi,s=Fi−1ΠsFi, with Fi the split-tree postcomposition matrix and Πs retaining all coordinates of pair output s. The Statement explicitly uses this same construction for arbitrary simple site charges.

[F2]

Unitary fusion category: the associator is unitary and tensor product preserves daggers.

Proof

Given: The category, pair, tree bases, and operators specified in the Statement.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Orthogonal simple summand inclusions satisfy vμ†vν=δμνid⁡ and ∑μvμvμ†=id⁡, with zero cross-composites for distinct simple labels. Tensoring and composing these identities up a finite tree proves that its split composites form an orthonormal basis, for the arbitrary simple inputs in the Statement. Each associator and its inverse is unitary, so Ai is unitary and (Aig)†(Aih)=g†h; hence Fi−1=Fi†. In the pair-first basis the coordinates are partitioned by pair output. Thus Πs†=Πs, Πs2=Πs, ΠsΠt=0 for s≠t, and ∑sΠs=I, including every multiplicity coordinate. The same identities hold on a zero-dimensional block with its unique empty maps.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

By step 1.1, Pi,s=Fi†ΠsFi, so Pi,s†=Pi,s and Pi,s2=Fi†Πs2Fi=Pi,s. For s≠t, Pi,sPi,t=Fi†ΠsΠtFi=0, and ∑sPi,s=Fi†IFi=I. When all site charges coincide this is exactly [F1]'s family.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources