Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-generator standard parabolics and the Bruhat subword property at arbitrary rank

Statement

Let S be any set with Coxeter matrix m, and let W,ℓ,T,≤ be as in Arbitrary-rank Coxeter presentations, length, reflections, and Bruhat order. For a finite J⊆S, let WJ∗ be the group presented by the restricted matrix m∣J, and let ϕJ:WJ∗→W send each generator to the same-named element.

  1. The map ϕJ is injective with image ⟨J⟩, and intrinsic length in WJ∗ equals ambient length in W on this subgroup.
  2. For y,w∈W, y≤w if and only if a reduced expression of y occurs as a subword of any fixed reduced expression of w. In particular, the interval {y:y≤w} is finite and has at most 2ℓ(w) elements.
  3. For every s∈S and w∈W, ℓ(sw)=ℓ(w)±1 and ℓ(ws)=ℓ(w)±1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The arbitrary-rank Coxeter presentation, its length and reflection-chain order, a finite subset J⊆S, and a finite set of generators K⊆S containing the supports used in a given argument.

[F1]

Arbitrary-rank Coxeter presentations, length, reflections, and Bruhat order: W is the quotient of the free group on S by the normal closure of the involution and finite braid relators; elements and relators have finite word support; ℓ is minimum word length; and y≤w means there is a finite chain of length-increasing right multiplications by reflections.

[F2]

Support, intrinsic parabolic presentations, minimal coset representatives and length additivity, with the type-A identification: for a finite Coxeter matrix on K and J⊆K, the canonical presentation map from the Coxeter group on J into the group on K is injective, and intrinsic J-length equals ambient K-length on that subgroup.

[F3]

Length parity, exchange, two-letter deletion, and faithfulness of the signed reflection action: in a finite-generator Coxeter system, left and right multiplication by a simple generator change length by exactly 1 in absolute value.

[F4]

The Bruhat graph by length-increasing reflection chains, the Bruhat order, inversion symmetry, and reflection parity: Bruhat comparison is the transitive closure of length-increasing right multiplication by reflections.

[F5]

The subword characterization of Bruhat order and its independence of the reduced expression: in a finite-generator Coxeter system, y≤w if and only if a reduced expression of y is a subword of any fixed reduced expression of w.

[F6]

Free group on a set of generators: every map from the generators of a free group to a group extends uniquely to a homomorphism.

[F7]

The normal closure of a subset of a group: the normal closure of a set is the intersection of all normal subgroups containing it.

Proof

Given: The data in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F6F7construct

Finite-generator parabolic embedding. The image of ϕJ is ⟨J⟩, since its image is generated by the named generators. To prove injectivity, let g∈WJ∗ map to 1, and represent g by a word u in J. In the free group F(S), the word u lies in the normal closure N of the Coxeter relators by [F1]. By [F7], N is the subgroup generated by all conjugates of those relators and their inverses: that subgroup is normal and contains the relators, and every normal subgroup containing the relators contains it. Therefore u is a finite product of conjugates of relators and their inverses. Let K contain J and every letter appearing in these finitely many conjugating words and relators. The inclusion F(K)→F(S) has a retraction sending generators outside K to 1, so it is injective by the free-group universal property [F6]. Thus the same finite product identity holds in F(K), and u is the identity in the Coxeter group presented on K. Applying [F2] to the finite system on K and its subset J shows that the map from WJ∗ into this group is injective. Hence g=1.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Intrinsic and ambient lengths. Every J-word is an S-word, so ambient length is at most intrinsic J-length. Conversely, take w∈WJ∗ and a reduced ambient expression for ϕJ(w), of length r. Let K contain J and the letters in that expression. By step 1.1 applied to K, the presentation on K embeds in W; thus the equality between a J-word for w and the chosen ambient word already holds in the group on K. By [F2], intrinsic J-length equals K-length on WJ∗. The chosen expression gives K-length at most r, while every K-word is also an S-word and so has length at least r. Hence both lengths equal r, proving intrinsic and ambient length equality.

3.1F1F3step 1.1step 2.1

Simple-generator length changes. Fix s∈S and w∈W. Choose a finite K containing s and the letters of a word for w. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 embed the group on K and preserve lengths. Applying [F3] in that finite-generator system gives both asserted ±1 formulas in W.

3.2F1F2F4F5step 1.1step 2.1

Bruhat comparison implies a subword. Suppose y≤w, and fix a reduced expression of w. Choose a finite Bruhat chain from y to w. Each element in this chain has finite word support, and each reflection used in an edge is a conjugate of a simple generator by a finite word. The union of these supports and the letters of the fixed expression of w is contained in a finite K⊆S. By steps 1.1 and 2.1, the chain lies in the embedded finite-generator group on K with all lengths preserved; its edges are still right multiplications by reflections. The finite-generator subword theorem [F5] now gives a reduced expression of y as a subword of the fixed expression of w.

3.3F1F4F5step 1.1step 2.1

A reduced subword implies Bruhat comparison. Suppose a reduced expression of y occurs as a subword of a fixed reduced expression of w. Let J be the finite support of that expression of w. The subword theorem [F5] gives y≤w in the finite-generator Coxeter group on J. By steps 1.1 and 2.1 its presentation embeds in W and preserves lengths; each reflection in the finite Bruhat chain maps to a reflection in W. The chain therefore gives y≤w in the global reflection-chain order.

4.1F1step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3∎

Every element below w is represented by a subword of a fixed reduced expression of w, by step 3.2. There are at most 2ℓ(w) such subwords, so the lower interval is finite with the stated bound. A strict comparison has a nonempty length-increasing chain by [F1], hence ℓ(y)<ℓ(w) when y<w. Steps 3.1–3.3 prove all remaining clauses. All supports, products in the normal closure, and chains used above are finite.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Arbitrary-rank Coxeter presentations, length, reflections, and Bruhat order.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources