How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The symmetrized product of an associative algebra is Jordan
Statement
Let be a field with and a unital associative -algebra. The product makes of Symmetrized product of an associative algebra a Jordan algebra. If is a complex associative algebra with involution as in Complex associative algebra with involution, then its self-adjoint part is a real vector subspace closed under , hence a real Jordan subalgebra of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field of characteristic not , a unital associative -algebra , and, for the second claim, a complex algebra involution on . Write in the associative multiplication.
The product on is (Symmetrized product of an associative algebra).
Multiplication on is bilinear and associative (Algebras over a commutative ring, central structure maps, and algebra homomorphisms).
A Jordan algebra has a commutative bilinear product satisfying (Jordan algebra over a field of characteristic not two).
In a complex algebra with involution, is conjugate-linear, , , and (Complex associative algebra with involution).
Proof
By [F1] and the bilinearity of multiplication in [F2], is bilinear; swapping leaves unchanged, so it is commutative. Also because is invertible in .
Using associativity from [F2], expand Here .
In the complex involutive case, is closed under addition and real scalar multiplication by conjugate-linearity in [F4], and it contains the unit because . For , so it is closed under .
The other side expands, using [F2], as which contains the same four terms as step 2.1.
Since is unital, [F1] gives for every . Steps 1.1, 2.1, and 3.1 prove bilinearity, commutativity, and the Jordan identity in [F3]. Thus is a unital Jordan algebra.
The real subspace inherits commutativity, bilinearity, and the Jordan identity from , so it is a real Jordan subalgebra.
Depends on
Used by
- The self-adjoint part need not be an associative subalgebra Counterexample
- The symmetrized product need not be associative Counterexample
- The spin factor and the plus-quadratic Clifford convention Proposition
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Complex associative algebra with involution.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. Jacobson, Lectures on Quadratic Jordan Algebras, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John C. Baez, The Octonions, §3.1, PDF p. 20 (standard reference, not scraped)