How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strict Beck monadicity theorem
Statement
Let be a right adjoint. Then is strictly monadic if and only if it strictly creates coequalizers of -split pairs.
Both clauses are on-the-nose: the comparison is an isomorphism of categories, and each supplied split coequalizer has a unique lift with the same apex and legs.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A right adjoint , a left adjoint , induced monad , and comparison functor .
The functor is strictly monadic when is an isomorphism of categories (Monadic and strictly monadic functors).
The Eilenberg–Moore forgetful functor strictly creates coequalizers of -split pairs (The Eilenberg–Moore forgetful functor strictly creates coequalizers of -split pairs).
The functor strictly creates coequalizers of -split pairs when every supplied splitting has a unique lift on the same apex and legs, and the lifted fork is a coequalizer (-split pairs and ordinary or strict creation of their coequalizers).
The underlying canonical presentation of every algebra is split in the base category (The canonical algebra presentation is split in the base, but its canonical splittings need not be algebra homomorphisms).
Every -algebra is the coequalizer in of its canonical pair of free algebras (Every algebra is the coequalizer of its canonical pair of free algebras).
Proof
For the forward direction, if is an isomorphism then on the nose. Transport through the inverse functor of preserves the exact apex, legs, and uniqueness in [L2], so has the strict-creation property in [L3].
For the reverse direction, [L4] makes each lifted canonical pair -split. Strict creation [L3] gives a unique object of on the prescribed underlying apex and a coequalizer whose underlying map is . Uniqueness and the coequalizer universal property define on algebra homomorphisms.
The functor and the given algebra are lifts of the same split base fork; [L2] and the canonical coequalizer [L5] make the lift unique, so on objects and morphisms. For , its counit fork is the existing lift of the canonical split fork of , so strict uniqueness gives and the same equality on morphisms. Hence is a two-sided inverse of , and is strictly monadic by [L1].
Step 1.1 proves the forward implication and steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove the reverse implication, establishing the biconditional.
Depends on
- Monadic and strictly monadic functors
- $U$-split pairs and ordinary or strict creation of their coequalizers
- The Eilenberg–Moore forgetful functor strictly creates coequalizers of $U^T$-split pairs
- The canonical algebra presentation is split in the base, but its canonical splittings need not be algebra homomorphisms
- Every algebra is the coequalizer of its canonical pair of free algebras
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd ed., Theorem VI.7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Exercise 5.5.i (standard reference, not scraped)