Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strict Beck monadicity theorem

Statement

Let U:DC be a right adjoint. Then U is strictly monadic if and only if it strictly creates coequalizers of U-split pairs.

Both clauses are on-the-nose: the comparison is an isomorphism of categories, and each supplied split coequalizer has a unique lift with the same apex and legs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A right adjoint U:DC, a left adjoint F, induced monad T, and comparison functor K.

[L1]

The functor U is strictly monadic when K is an isomorphism of categories (Monadic and strictly monadic functors).

[L2]

The Eilenberg–Moore forgetful functor strictly creates coequalizers of UT-split pairs (The Eilenberg–Moore forgetful functor strictly creates coequalizers of UT-split pairs).

[L3]

The functor U strictly creates coequalizers of U-split pairs when every supplied splitting has a unique lift on the same apex and legs, and the lifted fork is a coequalizer (U-split pairs and ordinary or strict creation of their coequalizers).

[L4]

The underlying canonical presentation of every algebra is split in the base category (The canonical algebra presentation is split in the base, but its canonical splittings need not be algebra homomorphisms).

[L5]

Every T-algebra is the coequalizer in CT of its canonical pair of free algebras (Every algebra is the coequalizer of its canonical pair of free algebras).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For the forward direction, if K is an isomorphism then U=UTK on the nose. Transport through the inverse functor of K preserves the exact apex, legs, and uniqueness in [L2], so U has the strict-creation property in [L3].

L1L2L3
1.2

For the reverse direction, [L4] makes each lifted canonical pair U-split. Strict creation [L3] gives a unique object H(A,a) of D on the prescribed underlying apex A and a coequalizer whose underlying map is a:TAA. Uniqueness and the coequalizer universal property define H on algebra homomorphisms.

L3L4construct
2.1

The functor K(H(A,a)) and the given algebra (A,a) are lifts of the same split base fork; [L2] and the canonical coequalizer [L5] make the lift unique, so KH=1CT on objects and morphisms. For dD, its counit fork is the existing lift of the canonical split fork of K(d), so strict uniqueness gives HK(d)=d and the same equality on morphisms. Hence H is a two-sided inverse of K, and U is strictly monadic by [L1].

step 1.2L1L2L5algebra
3.1

Step 1.1 proves the forward implication and steps 1.2 and 2.1 prove the reverse implication, establishing the biconditional.

step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources