Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Beta-Gamma identity

Statement

For Rep>0 and Req>0,

B(p,q)=Γ(p)Γ(q)Γ(p+q).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Complex numbers p,q with positive real parts.

[L1]

The real Beta-Gamma identity holds for positive real parameters (The real Beta--Gamma identity).

[L2]

On positive real arguments, the complex Gamma function agrees with the real Gamma function (The complex Gamma function restricts to the real Gamma function).

[L3]

If two holomorphic functions on a complex domain agree on a set with an accumulation point, then they agree everywhere (Identity theorem for holomorphic functions).

[L4]

Finite-interval parameter integrals of holomorphic kernels are holomorphic (A jointly continuous finite-interval parameter integral of holomorphic functions is holomorphic).

[L5]

Gamma is holomorphic on the right half-plane (Euler's Gamma function is holomorphic on the right half-plane).

[L7]

Euler's Beta and Gamma functions are defined by their classical integrals (Euler's Beta function on the right half-planes, Euler's Gamma function on the right half-plane).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix a real number q0>0. For n2, define Bn(p):=1/n11/ntp1(1t)q01dt. By [L4], each Bn is holomorphic on Rep>0. On a compact set K{p:Rep>0} choose a>0 with Repa on K; then the omitted tails are dominated by ta1(1t)q01 near 0 and by (1t)q01 near 1, so BnB(,q0) locally uniformly on Rep>0. Hence [L6] makes pB(p,q0) holomorphic there.

givenL4L6L7
2.1

The function Hq0(p):=Γ(p+q0)B(p,q0)Γ(p)Γ(q0) is holomorphic on Rep>0 by step 1.1 and [L5]. If p>0 is real, then [L1] and [L2] identify the complex and real formulas, so Hq0(p)=0. The positive real axis has an accumulation point in the right half-plane, so [L3] gives Hq00. Thus Γ(p+q0)B(p,q0)=Γ(p)Γ(q0)(Rep>0, q0>0 real).

step 1.1L1L2L3L5
3.1

Now fix p with Rep>0. Repeating step 1.1 with the roles of p and q reversed shows that qB(p,q) is holomorphic on Req>0. Therefore Kp(q):=Γ(p+q)B(p,q)Γ(p)Γ(q) is holomorphic on Req>0 by [L5]. Step 2.1 shows Kp(q)=0 for every positive real q, so [L3] gives Kp0. This is exactly the displayed identity.

step 2.1L3L5L6L7

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Euler's Beta function on the right half-planes.

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources