Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-measure identification of the Birkhoff limit

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let μ(X)<∞, let T preserve μ, let f∈L1(μ), and let f∗ be its Birkhoff limit. For the strict invariant sigma-algebra

I={E∈A:T−1E=E},

one has

∫Ef∗ dμ=∫Ef dμ(E∈I).

Moreover, f∗ has an I-measurable integrable representative, unique up to μ-a.e. equality, with these identities. For complex f the integrals and the representative are understood componentwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a finite measure space, T, f, f∗, and I as in the Statement.

[F1]

Birkhoff supplies an integrable a.e.-invariant limit (Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem), and the maximal theorem holds without invertibility (Maximal ergodic theorem).

[F2]

Every modulo-null invariant measurable set has a strictly invariant representative (Mod-null invariant sets have strict representatives).

[F3]

Indefinite integration of an integrable real or complex function is countably additive (The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets).

[F4]

Under AC, Radon–Nikodym gives the unique integrable density of a finite signed measure absolutely continuous with respect to a finite positive measure (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, The Axiom of Choice).

[F5]

Nonnegative integration is monotone and positively homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F6]

Nonnegative integrals over measurable null sets vanish; applying this to the positive and negative parts gives the same conclusion for integrable real functions (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes).

Proof

technique · direct invariant-stratum argument followed by Radon–Nikodym
1.1F1algebra

First let g be a finite-valued real integrable representative, let C be the measurable conull set where its averages converge to a finite limit, and choose its Birkhoff-limit representative g∗ to be that limit on C and zero elsewhere. The shifted-average identity and its rearrangement show that the convergence set is strictly invariant and that g∗ is strictly invariant.

1.2F3F4

Suppose first that f is real. On (X,I) define ν(E)=∫Ef dμ. This is a finite signed measure by [F3], is absolutely continuous with respect to μ∣I, and has finite total variation. By [F4] there is an integrable I-measurable h such that ∫Eh=∫Ef for every E∈I. This is the unique step spending AC.

2.1F1F6step 1.1algebra

Fix a positive integer m and, for k∈Z, put Dm,k={k/m≤g∗<(k+1)/m}. These form a measurable, strict-invariant partition of X. For ε>0, set q=(g−(k/m−ε))1Dm,k and M={sup⁡n≥1Snq>0}. The function q is integrable because g is integrable and μ(Dm,k)<∞. Strict invariance gives Anq=(Ang−k/m+ε)1Dm,k pointwise. On Dm,k∩C these averages tend to g∗−k/m+ε≥ε>0, so Dm,k∩C⊆M. Outside Dm,k all partial sums of q are zero, so M⊆Dm,k. Thus Dm,k∖M is a measurable null set. Applying [F6] to q+ and q− on this difference justifies replacing the integral over M by the integral over Dm,k. The maximal theorem therefore gives 0≤∫Mq dμ=∫Dm,kq dμ=∫Dm,kg dμ−(k/m−ε)μ(Dm,k). Since μ(Dm,k)<∞, letting ε↓0 gives the same inequality with k/m.

3.1F1F3F5step 2.1

On Dm,k one has g∗<(k+1)/m, so step 2.1 gives ∫Dm,kg∗ dμ≤∫Dm,kg dμ+1mμ(Dm,k). Countable additivity over the partition is legitimate because g and g∗ are integrable. Summing yields ∫Xg∗ dμ≤∫Xg dμ+μ(X)m. Letting m→∞ and then applying the same inequality to −g, whose limit is −g∗, proves ∫g∗=∫g.

4.1F1step 3.1

Let E∈I and take g=f1E. Strict invariance gives Ang=(Anf)1E pointwise, so the Birkhoff limit of g is f∗1E a.e. In the real case, step 3.1 therefore gives ∫Ef∗ dμ=∫Ef dμ.

5.1F2F5step 4.1step 1.2

Since h is I-measurable, every rational sublevel set of h is strictly invariant; rational separation therefore gives h∘T=h pointwise. Thus, because f∗ is invariant almost everywhere, Br={f∗−h>r} is invariant modulo null sets for every rational r>0. Let Er∈I be its strict representative from [F2]. Steps 4.1 and 1.2 give ∫Er(f∗−h)=0, while f∗−h>r a.e. on Er. Monotonicity implies 0≥rμ(Er), so Er is null. Applying the same argument to h−f∗ and taking the countable union over positive rational r proves f∗=h a.e.

6.1F4step 4.1step 5.1∎

For complex f, apply steps 1.2–5.1 to its real and imaginary parts and set h=h1+ih2. This h is integrable and I-measurable, equals f∗ a.e., and has all asserted event-integral identities. Uniqueness follows componentwise from Radon–Nikodym uniqueness. If μ(X)=0, the same proof gives the zero density and all assertions are vacuous off a null set.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources