Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-measure identification of the Birkhoff limit

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let μ(X)<, let T preserve μ, let fL1(μ), and let f be its Birkhoff limit. For the strict invariant sigma-algebra

I={EA:T1E=E},

one has

Efdμ=Efdμ(EI).

Moreover, f has an I-measurable integrable representative, unique up to μ-a.e. equality, with these identities. For complex f the integrals and the representative are understood componentwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a finite measure space, T, f, f, and I as in the Statement.

[F1]

Birkhoff supplies an integrable a.e.-invariant limit (Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem), and the maximal theorem holds without invertibility (Maximal ergodic theorem).

[F2]

Every modulo-null invariant measurable set has a strictly invariant representative (Mod-null invariant sets have strict representatives).

[F3]

Indefinite integration of an integrable real or complex function is countably additive (The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets).

[F4]

Under AC, Radon–Nikodym gives the unique integrable density of a finite signed measure absolutely continuous with respect to a finite positive measure (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, The Axiom of Choice).

[F5]

Nonnegative integration is monotone and positively homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

Proof

technique · direct invariant-stratum argument followed by Radon–Nikodym
1.1

First let g be real and integrable, and choose its Birkhoff-limit representative g to be the pointwise limit on the convergence set and zero elsewhere. The shifted-average identity and its rearrangement show that the convergence set is strictly invariant and that g is strictly invariant.

F1algebra
1.2

Suppose first that f is real. On (X,I) define ν(E)=Efdμ. This is a finite signed measure by [F3], is absolutely continuous with respect to μI, and has finite total variation. By [F4] there is an integrable I-measurable h such that Eh=Ef for every EI. This is the unique step spending AC.

F3F4
2.1

Fix a positive integer m and, for kZ, put Dm,k={k/mg<(k+1)/m}. These form a measurable, strict-invariant partition of X. For ε>0, every point of Dm,k belongs to the positive-maximal set of (g(k/mε))1Dm,k. The maximal theorem and strict invariance therefore give Dm,kgdμ(k/mε)μ(Dm,k). Since μ(Dm,k)<, letting ε0 gives the same inequality with k/m.

F1F5step 1.1
3.1

On Dm,k one has g<(k+1)/m, so step 2.1 gives Dm,kgdμDm,kgdμ+1mμ(Dm,k). Countable additivity over the partition is legitimate because g and g are integrable. Summing yields XgdμXgdμ+μ(X)m. Letting m and then applying the same inequality to g, whose limit is g, proves g=g.

F1F3F5step 2.1
4.1

Let EI and take g=f1E. Strict invariance gives Ang=(Anf)1E pointwise, so the Birkhoff limit of g is f1E a.e. In the real case, step 3.1 therefore gives Efdμ=Efdμ.

F1step 3.1
5.1

Since h is I-measurable, every rational sublevel set of h is strictly invariant; rational separation therefore gives hT=h pointwise. Thus, because f is invariant almost everywhere, Br={fh>r} is invariant modulo null sets for every rational r>0. Let ErI be its strict representative from [F2]. Steps 4.1 and 1.2 give Er(fh)=0, while fh>r a.e. on Er. Monotonicity implies 0rμ(Er), so Er is null. Applying the same argument to hf and taking the countable union over positive rational r proves f=h a.e.

F2F5step 4.1step 1.2
6.1

For complex f, apply steps 1.2–5.1 to its real and imaginary parts and set h=h1+ih2. This h is integrable and I-measurable, equals f a.e., and has all asserted event-integral identities. Uniqueness follows componentwise from Radon–Nikodym uniqueness. If μ(X)=0, the same proof gives the zero density and all assertions are vacuous off a null set.

F4step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources