How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-measure identification of the Birkhoff limit
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , let preserve , let , and let be its Birkhoff limit. For the strict invariant sigma-algebra
one has
Moreover, has an -measurable integrable representative, unique up to -a.e. equality, with these identities. For complex the integrals and the representative are understood componentwise.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a finite measure space, , , , and as in the Statement.
Birkhoff supplies an integrable a.e.-invariant limit (Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem), and the maximal theorem holds without invertibility (Maximal ergodic theorem).
Every modulo-null invariant measurable set has a strictly invariant representative (Mod-null invariant sets have strict representatives).
Indefinite integration of an integrable real or complex function is countably additive (The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets).
Under AC, Radon–Nikodym gives the unique integrable density of a finite signed measure absolutely continuous with respect to a finite positive measure (A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density, The Axiom of Choice).
Nonnegative integration is monotone and positively homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Proof
First let be real and integrable, and choose its Birkhoff-limit representative to be the pointwise limit on the convergence set and zero elsewhere. The shifted-average identity and its rearrangement show that the convergence set is strictly invariant and that is strictly invariant.
Suppose first that is real. On define . This is a finite signed measure by [F3], is absolutely continuous with respect to , and has finite total variation. By [F4] there is an integrable -measurable such that for every . This is the unique step spending AC.
Fix a positive integer and, for , put These form a measurable, strict-invariant partition of . For , every point of belongs to the positive-maximal set of . The maximal theorem and strict invariance therefore give Since , letting gives the same inequality with .
On one has , so step 2.1 gives Countable additivity over the partition is legitimate because and are integrable. Summing yields Letting and then applying the same inequality to , whose limit is , proves .
Let and take . Strict invariance gives pointwise, so the Birkhoff limit of is a.e. In the real case, step 3.1 therefore gives
Since is -measurable, every rational sublevel set of is strictly invariant; rational separation therefore gives pointwise. Thus, because is invariant almost everywhere, is invariant modulo null sets for every rational . Let be its strict representative from [F2]. Steps 4.1 and 1.2 give , while a.e. on . Monotonicity implies , so is null. Applying the same argument to and taking the countable union over positive rational proves a.e.
For complex , apply steps 1.2–5.1 to its real and imaginary parts and set . This is integrable and -measurable, equals a.e., and has all asserted event-integral identities. Uniqueness follows componentwise from Radon–Nikodym uniqueness. If , the same proof gives the zero density and all assertions are vacuous off a null set.
Depends on
- Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem
- Maximal ergodic theorem
- Strict and mod-null invariant sigma-algebras
- Mod-null invariant sets have strict representatives
- A sigma-finite signed measure that is absolutely continuous with respect to a sigma-finite positive measure has a unique almost-everywhere density
- Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps
- The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alessio Del Vigna, The Birkhoff Ergodic Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles Walkden, Ergodic Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Omri Sarig, Lecture Notes on Ergodic Theory (2023) (standard reference, not scraped)