How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming choice, the canonical map is linear and injective
Statement
Assume the axiom of choice. For every vector space , the canonical map is linear and injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The axiom of choice and an -vector space .
The canonical map is defined by for and (The canonical evaluation map given by ).
If , some functional vanishes on and takes value at (Assuming choice, if , some vanishes on and satisfies ).
A linear map is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial (The kernel and image are linear subspaces, and a linear map is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial).
Proof
For , , and , [L1] gives . Equality at every proves that is linear.
If , apply [L2] to to obtain with . Then , so . Hence .
By [L3], step 1.2 makes injective; step 1.1 supplies linearity. The zero space is included, since its unique map has trivial kernel.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 31 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. Conrad, Infinite-Dimensional Dual Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)