Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projection and quadrature errors split in L2

Statement

Let u∈L2(ρ) be real, choose a representative u~ defined at every node of the finite cubature rule used below, let Λ be finite, and use the exact and quadrature coefficients from Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection and Quadrature estimates of polynomial-chaos coefficients, with u~ as the evaluable input to that estimator. Then ∥u−P^Λu∥L2(ρ)2=∥u−PΛu∥L2(ρ)2+∑α∈Λ∣c^α−cα∣2. Since the finite sum equals ∥P^Λu−PΛu∥L2(ρ)2, the triangle inequality also gives ∥u−P^Λu∥L2(ρ)≤∥u−PΛu∥L2(ρ)+∥P^Λu−PΛu∥L2(ρ). Thus coefficient quadrature error and finite-space projection error remain separate even when no completeness statement is available.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite real orthonormal family, u∈L2(ρ), and finite quadrature values c^α.

[F1]

Quadrature estimates of polynomial-chaos coefficients defines P^Λu using the finite basis sum.

[F2]

Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection defines cα=⟨u,ψα⟩ and PΛu=∑α∈Λcαψα.

[F3]

Independent polynomial-chaos tensor products are orthonormal gives the orthonormality of the finite basis.

[F4]

Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection gives the choice-free bilinear integral pairing inducing the L2 norm; the finite orthogonality identities follow by expansion.

[F5]

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for L2 bounds ∫∣vw∣ dρ, and The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus bounds ∣∫vw dρ∣ by that integral. Expanding ∥v+w∥22 then gives the norm triangle inequality.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4algebra

For each β∈Λ, the coefficient formula [F2], orthonormality [F3], and bilinearity [F4] give ⟨u−PΛu,ψβ⟩=cβ−∑α∈Λcαδαβ=0. Thus u−PΛu is orthogonal to the finite span PΛ, including when Λ is empty. Subtracting the two finite expansions gives P^Λu−PΛu=∑α∈Λ(c^α−cα)ψα∈PΛ, so this difference is orthogonal to the residual.

2.1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra∎

The identity u−P^Λu=(u−PΛu)−(P^Λu−PΛu) is an orthogonal sum by step 1.1. Expanding its squared norm using [F4] gives ∥u−P^Λu∥2=∥u−PΛu∥2+∥P^Λu−PΛu∥2; orthonormality [F3] identifies the second term with ∑α∈Λ∣c^α−cα∣2. To obtain the final inequality, use [F5] to expand ∥v+w∥22 and deduce ∥v+w∥2≤∥v∥2+∥w∥2 for v=u−PΛu and w=PΛu−P^Λu.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources