Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-dimensional convex value function has a support at relative-interior points

Statement

Let V be a finite-dimensional Euclidean space and let p:V→(−∞,+∞] be convex, never −∞, and finite somewhere. If 0∈ri⁡(dom⁡p) and p(0)∈R, then there is a linear functional ℓ:V→R such that p(z)≥p(0)+ℓ(z)(z∈V).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-dimensional Euclidean space, convex value function, relative-interior point, and finite value in the Statement. The conventions for domains, affine hull, relative interior and epigraph are those of Finite-dimensional convex program, Lagrangian dual, and Slater condition.

[F1]

A finite convex real-valued function on an open convex subset of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space is locally Lipschitz and hence continuous (A convex function on an open convex set is locally Lipschitz).

[F2]

Every point has a nearest point in a nonempty closed convex Euclidean set (Every point has a unique nearest point in a nonempty closed Euclidean convex set), and the projection satisfies ⟨z−ΠCz,y−ΠCz⟩≤0 for every y∈C (Metric projection onto a closed convex set satisfies the variational inequality).

[F3]

The unit sphere in a finite-dimensional normed space is sequentially compact, including the choice-free finite-dimensional case (Unit spheres in finite-dimensional normed spaces are sequentially compact).

Proof

1.1givenF1

Let W=aff⁡(dom⁡p). Since 0 belongs to the domain, W is a linear subspace; relative interior gives a ball about 0 in W contained in dom⁡p. If W={0}, take ℓ=0. Otherwise identify W with a Euclidean coordinate space. The restriction of p to that open ball is finite and convex, so [F1] makes it continuous at 0.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

In W×R, let E={(z,t):p(z)≤t} and let E‾ be its closure. The set E is convex, (0,p(0))∈E, and E‾ is nonempty, closed and convex. Continuity from step 1.1 shows that (0,p(0)−ϵ)∉E‾ for every ϵ>0: choose δ>0 so p(z)>p(0)−ϵ/3 whenever ∥z∥<δ, while a sufficiently small open ball about (0,p(0)−ϵ) has ∥z∥<δ and t<p(0)−2ϵ/3, so it misses E. Thus (0,p(0)) is a boundary point of E‾.

3.1F2F3step 2.1construct

For each positive integer k, project zk=(0,p(0)−1/k) onto E‾, obtaining yk. Since (0,p(0))∈E‾, the projection distance is at most 1/k, so yk→(0,p(0)). The unit vectors ak=(yk−zk)/∥yk−zk∥2 have a convergent subsequence by [F3], with unit limit a=(s,α)∈W×R. For each y∈E‾, [F2] gives ⟨ak,y−yk⟩≥0; passing along that subsequence gives ⟨a,y−(0,p(0))⟩≥0.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

The epigraph contains every upward vertical ray, so the support inequality forces α≥0. If α=0, points (z,p(z))∈E for all sufficiently small z and −z in the ball from step 1.1 force both ⟨s,z⟩≥0 and ⟨s,−z⟩≥0. Hence s=0, contradicting ∥a∥2=1. Therefore α>0. Setting ℓ(z)=−⟨s,z⟩/α, the support inequality at (z,p(z)) yields p(z)≥p(0)+ℓ(z) for z in the domain; outside the domain the inequality is automatic because p(z)=+∞.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources