Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Different exponents in tame and wild ramification

Statement

For Pp, vP(DK)e(P/p)1. Equality holds when ramification is tame; when it is wild, vP(DK)e(P/p).

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

Lemma 4.12 and the proof of Theorem 4.13 in the cited source give the trace criterion for divisibility by powers of P and apply it to the filtration of OK/Pe.

Proof

Given: a prime Pp and its ramification index e.

1.1

That trace criterion first gives vP(DK)e1. For the next power, the successive quotients Pi/Pi+1 are all isomorphic to the residue field as modules, so the relevant trace is eTrOK/P/Fp.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

The trace of a finite separable field extension is not the zero map. Hence the display in step 1.1 vanishes identically exactly when pe. Thus pe gives exact exponent e1, while pe gives exponent at least e, which are precisely the tame and wild cases.

L1step 1.1cases

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources