How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Different exponents in tame and wild ramification
Statement
For , . Equality holds when ramification is tame; when it is wild, .
Facts & Assumptions
Lemma 4.12 and the proof of Theorem 4.13 in the cited source give the trace criterion for divisibility by powers of and apply it to the filtration of .
Proof
Given: a prime and its ramification index .
That trace criterion first gives . For the next power, the successive quotients are all isomorphic to the residue field as modules, so the relevant trace is
The trace of a finite separable field extension is not the zero map. Hence the display in step 1.1 vanishes identically exactly when . Thus gives exact exponent , while gives exponent at least , which are precisely the tame and wild cases.
Depends on
Used by
- A tame different exponent Example
- A wild different exponent Example
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, The Different Ideal, Theorem 4.13 (standard reference, not scraped)