How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Fox-coloring algorithm terminates and returns all colorings
Statement
For every odd prime and every finite regular oriented link diagram , the algorithm in the Definition terminates and returns exactly . If its reduced system has free variables, it returns colorings. For a diagram with arcs and crossings it uses at most pivots, at most pivot-search entry tests, at most row additions to clear pivot columns, at most coefficient updates in those row additions, and at most divisions to normalize pivot rows.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An odd prime and a finite regular oriented link diagram with arcs and crossings.
Compute dihedral Fox colorings by row reduction: the input equations are over ; each pivot is selected in the leftmost available column and row, normalized, and cleared in every other row.
Regular oriented link diagrams: a regular diagram has finitely many crossings and finitely many arcs between crossings.
is prime; thus every nonzero residue modulo is invertible by Bézout's identity.
Proof
Each crossing contributes one linear equation in the arc variables, so the algorithm forms a matrix over . Addition and multiplication of residue classes are well-defined because congruence modulo is preserved by sums and products. If a residue is nonzero, then , so integers satisfy and is the inverse of modulo . The field hypothesis in [A1] therefore supplies every division used by the pivot instructions in [F1].
Every row operation in [F1] preserves the solution set of the homogeneous system. A row swap is reversible by the same swap; multiplying a row by a nonzero scalar is reversible by multiplying by its inverse; and adding a multiple of one row to another is reversible by subtracting the same multiple. Each transformed system is therefore equivalent to the preceding one.
The algorithm visits each of the columns once, and each pivot search inspects at most rows, for at most pivot-search entry tests. There are at most pivots. If , there are no pivots or row additions. If , each pivot adds a multiple of its row to at most other rows, so at most row additions occur; each addition updates at most coefficients, for at most coefficient updates. Normalizing each pivot row divides at most entries, for at most divisions. The loops are finite and the chosen first nonzero entry makes the procedure deterministic.
At termination, each pivot column has a single in its pivot row and zeros in every other row; earlier pivot columns stay cleared because each later pivot row is zero in those columns. Each nonpivot column is free. The pivot equations uniquely determine the pivot variables from arbitrary free-variable values, and every such assignment satisfies the reduced system. By step 2.1 the reduced system has exactly the original solution set, so the returned assignments are exactly the Fox colorings.
There are exactly choices of the free variables, and each determines one distinct solution. If , then and the empty diagram has its unique empty assignment; if , every arc variable is free and all assignments are returned. The stated pivot, search, addition, update, and division bounds follow from step 2.2.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Józef H. Przytycki, 3-coloring and other elementary invariants of knots, §2, arXiv:math/0608172, pp. 10–11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- V. O. Manturov, Knot Theory, Chapter 5, §5.1, printed pp. 49–52 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Scott Carter, A Survey of Quandle Ideas, §2, arXiv:1002.4429v2, pp. 3–8 (standard reference, not scraped)