How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tree automorphisms without inversions are either elliptic or hyperbolic
Statement
Let be an automorphism of a simplicial tree acting without inversions. Then the minimum in
exists. Exactly one of the following holds:
- , in which case fixes a vertex of ;
- , in which case there is a unique bi-infinite reduced path preserved by , and acts on as a translation by distance .
The first case is called elliptic and the second hyperbolic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An automorphism of a simplicial tree acting without inversions.
An action without inversions sends no oriented edge to its reverse. (Edge inversions and actions without inversions)
The translation length is defined as . (The translation length of a tree automorphism without inversions)
If fixes a vertex, then its fixed vertices form a subtree. (The nonempty fixed-vertex set of a tree automorphism is a subtree)
The path metric on a simplicial tree is integer-valued and realized by the unique reduced path between vertices. (The path metric on a simplicial tree is geodesic and integer-valued)
Proof
By [L4], every displacement is a natural number, so choose with minimal displacement . Then by [L2]. If , the vertex is fixed and [L3] describes the fixed subtree.
Assume , and let be the unique reduced path from to . Its translate is the unique reduced path from to . If and met in more than the vertex , then some interior point of the overlap would have displacement strictly smaller than , contradicting step 1.1; if they shared an edge with opposite orientations, that edge would be inverted, contradicting [L1]. Hence consecutive translates and meet only at one endpoint. [L1, L4, step 1.1, assume-case[hyperbolic], algebra]
Therefore is a bi-infinite reduced path. It is preserved by , and sends each segment onto , so every vertex on moves distance exactly along that line. Thus acts on as translation by .
Let be a vertex not on , and let be the first vertex of on the unique reduced path from to . Then the geodesic from to runs from to , then along from to by length , and then from to , so . Hence the vertices of minimal displacement are exactly those on , which makes unique. This is the hyperbolic case, and it excludes fixed vertices.
Depends on
Used by
- Translation length is conjugacy invariant and homogeneous on powers Corollary
- Elliptic and hyperbolic automorphisms on the line Example
- The bi-infinite line and its translation action Example
- FALSE: a quotient of a tree by a group action is always a tree False statement
- FALSE: every tree automorphism fixes a vertex False statement
- FALSE: translation length is always the distance from an arbitrary basepoint False statement
- Disjoint-axis hyperbolic automorphisms satisfy ping-pong on a tree Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The translation length of a tree automorphism without inversions.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jean-Pierre Serre, Trees (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Loh, Geometric Group Theory: An Introduction (2015 course version) (standard reference, not scraped)