Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivalent characterizations of second-countable type I groups

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a second-countable locally compact group G the following are equivalent: (i) G is type I; (ii) every factor representation of G on a separable Hilbert space is type I (equivalently, is a multiple of an irreducible); (iii) the Mackey Borel structure and the Fell-topology Borel structure on G^ coincide and G^ is standard Borel; (iv) G^ is countably separated (Mackey Borel structure and countable separation of the unitary dual); (v) the map κ:G^→Prim⁡(C∗(G)) is a homeomorphism onto its image.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The type-I group convention means exactly that every nonzero separable factor representation is type I; a separable factor is type I precisely when its representation is a multiple of an irreducible (Type I factor representations and type I groups).

[F2]

For the second-countable group, the local criteria lemma equates the factor-type-I condition, standardness of the Mackey dual together with equality with Fell Borel sets, countable separation, and the primitive-kernel homeomorphism condition (Glimm criteria for separable C star algebras and type I groups). Its sole original-source cited implication is recorded in that supplier; this theorem imports no additional cited fact.

[F3]
[A1]

AC is assumed and inherited by all selections in the criteria and definitional suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct, by the exact criteria and definitional interfaces

Given: AC and the second-countable locally compact group G of the Statement.

1.1F1A1given

By [F1], clause (i) is the definition of clause (ii). The parenthetical equivalence in (ii) is precisely the separable factor-to-multiple equivalence discharged in [F1], so it retains every stated multiplicity, including countably infinite multiplicity. These are nonzero factor representations; the zero carrier introduces no additional obligation.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1

By [F2], the condition in clause (ii) is equivalent to standardness of the Mackey dual together with equality of Mackey and Fell-topology Borel sets, which is clause (iii) under [F3]; it is also equivalent to countable separation in clause (iv) and to the homeomorphism condition in clause (v). In particular, a homeomorphism onto its image is injective and gives the kernel criterion of [F2]; conversely that criterion supplies the asserted homeomorphism. The primitive-kernel map has image all primitive ideals because a primitive ideal is the kernel of an irreducible nondegenerate representation, but the weaker literal “onto its image” formulation is already enough. Thus the implications are in both directions, with the Borel equality and topological assertion included.

3.1F1F2F3A1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Combining step 1.1 and step 2.1 proves the exact five clauses in the Statement. The canonical dual-indexed irreducible-multiplicity decomposition is a subsequent theorem using the now-proved standard dual; it is not a premise of these equivalences. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F3], and this assembly makes no additional field selections.

Proof boundary

The criteria supplier contains exactly the owner-authorized Glimm factor-type-I-to-GCR cited implication. This theorem introduces no additional cited fact and asserts only its five literal clauses. Its factor representations follow the nonzero separable convention of the Definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources