How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The ideal-gas star-pressure root exists uniquely exactly below vacuum threshold
Statement
For the data of Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response, let The residual is and strictly increasing on . If , then has exactly one zero . By the acoustic wave-response lemma this is the unique positive pressure at which the left and right wave curves can be joined by a contact. It lies in the explicit bracket , where, writing and , If , then there is no positive matching pressure. The limiting left and right rarefaction-tail velocities are ordered with a vacuum gap, or coincide at the zero-pressure equality threshold. No other vacuum condition is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive densities and pressures, , and the response functions from Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response.
Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response: on each side the rarefaction and shock formulas define and for .
Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and : a continuous function on a closed real interval takes every value between its endpoint values.
Ideal-gas acoustic wave curves have the stated pressure response: the left and right star velocities are and ; they match at a positive pressure exactly when , and their star states are then joined by a contact.
Proof
On , differentiation gives ; on , it gives . At both derivatives equal , so is and strictly increasing on . Thus is also and strictly increasing.
For , we have and , because . The shock formula therefore gives . The stated exceeds both and , so , and consequently .
The rarefaction formula in [F1] tends to as , hence . If this limit is nonnegative, strict increase makes for every , so there is no positive zero.
If , continuity at the extended endpoint gives some with . Applying [F2] to on gives a zero in ; strict increase from step 1.1 makes it unique on . Thus .
Taking the limits in [F3] using step 2.1 gives the left tail velocity and the right tail velocity , so . If this right-minus-left gap is positive, the tails leave a vacuum interval; at equality they meet. If it is negative, step 3.1 gives the unique positive pressure at which the two wave responses match and the contact joins their star states. This proves the stated threshold and matching interpretation.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-budget safeguarded Newton–bisection for Euler star pressure Algorithm
- Euler vacuum detection at and above the pressure-root threshold Example
- Sod tube: a unique star-pressure root between the initial pressures Example
- The safeguarded Euler pressure solver preserves its root bracket and terminates Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Randall J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws (standard reference, not scraped)