Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The ideal-gas star-pressure root exists uniquely exactly below vacuum threshold

Statement

For the data of Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response, let Φ(0+):=uR−uL−2(cL+cR)γ−1. The residual Φ is C1 and strictly increasing on (0,∞). If Φ(0+)<0, then Φ has exactly one zero p∗>0. By the acoustic wave-response lemma this is the unique positive pressure at which the left and right wave curves can be joined by a contact. It lies in the explicit bracket 0<p∗<P, where, writing D=max⁡{0,uL−uR} and K=AL+AR, P=2max⁡{pL,pR}+6D2K2+pL. If Φ(0+)≥0, then there is no positive matching pressure. The limiting left and right rarefaction-tail velocities are ordered with a vacuum gap, or coincide at the zero-pressure equality threshold. No other vacuum condition is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive densities and pressures, γ>1, and the response functions from Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response.

[F1]

Ideal-gas rarefaction and shock pressure response: on each side the rarefaction and shock formulas define fK(p) and Φ(p)=fL(p)+fR(p)+uR−uL for p>0.

[F3]

Ideal-gas acoustic wave curves have the stated pressure response: the left and right star velocities are uL−fL(p) and uR+fR(p); they match at a positive pressure exactly when Φ(p)=0, and their star states are then joined by a contact.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

On 0<p≤pK, differentiation gives fK′(p)=cKγpK(ppK)−(γ+1)/(2γ)>0; on p≥pK, it gives fK′(p)=AK(p+pK+2BK)2(p+BK)3/2>0. At p=pK both derivatives equal 1/γρKpK, so fK is C1 and strictly increasing on (0,∞). Thus Φ is also C1 and strictly increasing.

1.2F1algebra

For p≥2pK, we have p−pK≥p/2 and p+BK≤3p/2, because 0<BK<pK≤p/2. The shock formula therefore gives fK(p)≥AKp/6. The stated P exceeds both 2pK and 6D2/K2, so fL(P)+fR(P)≥KP/6>D, and consequently Φ(P)>0.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

The rarefaction formula in [F1] tends to −2cK/(γ−1) as p↓0, hence lim⁡p↓0Φ(p)=Φ(0+). If this limit is nonnegative, strict increase makes Φ(p)>0 for every p>0, so there is no positive zero.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2F2choose

If Φ(0+)<0, continuity at the extended endpoint 0 gives some ϵ∈(0,P) with Φ(ϵ)<0. Applying [F2] to Φ on [ϵ,P] gives a zero in (ϵ,P); strict increase from step 1.1 makes it unique on (0,∞). Thus 0<p∗<P.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1F3algebra∎

Taking the limits in [F3] using step 2.1 gives the left tail velocity vL=uL+2cL/(γ−1) and the right tail velocity vR=uR−2cR/(γ−1), so vR−vL=Φ(0+). If this right-minus-left gap is positive, the tails leave a vacuum interval; at equality they meet. If it is negative, step 3.1 gives the unique positive pressure at which the two wave responses match and the contact joins their star states. This proves the stated threshold and matching interpretation.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources