How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence of the bounded above left total derived functor
Statement
For additive and supplied bounded-above projective replacements with the model-equivalence hypotheses, the replacement construction is a functor with the terminal universal property in its definition. Right exactness of is not needed for existence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For additive and supplied bounded-above projective replacements with the model-equivalence hypotheses, the replacement construction is a functor with the terminal universal property in its definition. Right exactness of is not needed for existence.
Supplied projective models and the augmentation specify the left total derived construction (Left total derived functor on the bounded above derived category).
Projective replacement comparisons are unique relative to augmentations (Left total derived functor is independent up to a unique augmentation-compatible natural isomorphism).
An additive functor induces an exact functor on homotopy categories (An additive functor on abelian categories induces an exact functor on homotopy categories).
Proof
Compose the supplied quasi-inverse with and . These are functors, so this gives on all arrows, including identities and zero complexes. The homotopy equality for an ordinary map makes a natural augmentation.
Given , for a projective complex put ; the augmentation here is invertible by replacement comparison with . For general define . This is meaningful since both functors take to isomorphisms. For a derived arrow, lift its conjugate between projective models; naturality of on that ordinary homotopy-class map gives naturality of after conjugation.
Naturality of along and of gives . Conversely this equation determines on projective complexes because is invertible, and naturality along forces the formula at every object. Thus the universal comparison exists uniquely. All uses of required only additivity and preservation of homotopies.
Depends on
Used by
- Derived tensor product in the bounded above setting Definition
- Classical derived functors are the cohomology objects of the total derived functor Proposition
- Total derived functors send distinguished triangles to distinguished triangles Proposition
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Left total derived functor on the bounded above derived category.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 10.5.1–10.5.8, pp. 391–393; restrict to supplied replacement data (standard reference, not scraped)