How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every nontrivial finite abelian group is an internal direct product of indecomposable subgroups
Statement
Every nontrivial finite abelian group is an internal direct product of finitely many indecomposable subgroups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
A nontrivial finite abelian group is indecomposable if it is not an internal direct product of two nontrivial subgroups in the sense of def-internal-direct-product-of-subgroups. It is decomposable if such a product exists. The trivial group is assigned neither label. (Indecomposable and decomposable nontrivial finite abelian groups).
Let be a property of naturals such that for every , if holds for all then . Then holds for all . (At the hypothesis is vacuous, so is forced.) (Strong (complete) induction).
Let . The following are equivalent: the form an internal direct product of ; every has a unique expression with ; and the multiplication map is an isomorphism. These statements include the empty family and the one-factor case. (Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation).
Let be a finite group and . Then Consequently, under the canonical embedding , divides . (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Proof
For strong induction on , the order-one case is vacuous because the only group of that order is trivial.
Fix a nontrivial and assume the result for every nontrivial finite abelian group of smaller order. If is indecomposable, the one-factor product is the required decomposition.
If is decomposable, write with and nontrivial. Lagrange gives , so the induction hypothesis decomposes each into indecomposable factors.
Unique factorisation in and in the two inductive products combines to unique factorisation by all the smaller factors; internal-product recognition completes the induction.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 80 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, Decomposition of Finite Abelian Groups, §§1-4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Elman, Lectures on Abstract Algebra, Ch. 14 (standard reference, not scraped)