Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite chaos projection, Parseval identity, mean, and variance

Statement

Let Λ be finite, contain 0, and let the real basis (ψα)α∈Λ be as in Finite orthonormal polynomial tensor basis. For real u∈L2(ρ) set cα=⟨u,ψα⟩ and PΛu=∑α∈Λcαψα as in Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection. Then ∥u∥L2(ρ)2=∑α∈Λcα2+∥u−PΛu∥L2(ρ)2. The residual is orthogonal to PΛ, E[u]=c0, and Var⁡(u)=∑α∈Λ∖{0}cα2+∥u−PΛu∥L2(ρ)2. Here Var⁡(u)=E[(u−Eu)2]; no completeness of the polynomial family is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite real orthonormal polynomial family containing ψ0=1 and u∈L2(ρ).

[F1]

Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection defines cα and PΛu by the displayed finite sum.

[F2]

Independent polynomial-chaos tensor products are orthonormal gives ⟨ψα,ψβ⟩=δαβ and ψ0=1.

[F3]

Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection establishes the choice-free integral inner product and its norm-square identity; bilinearity and symmetry give the finite orthogonal norm identities by expansion, without completeness.

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

For each β∈Λ, bilinearity and [F2] give ⟨u−PΛu,ψβ⟩=cβ−∑α∈Λcαδαβ=0. Thus the residual is orthogonal to every basis vector and hence to their finite span.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Write u=PΛu+(u−PΛu). By step 1.1 the two terms are orthogonal, so bilinearity and symmetry from [F3] give ∥u∥22=∥PΛu∥22+∥u−PΛu∥22. Expanding the finite sum with [F2] gives ∥PΛu∥22=∑α,β∈Λcαcβδαβ=∑α∈Λcα2. This proves the norm identity directly from the integral pairing.

3.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Since ψ0=1, c0=⟨u,1⟩=E[u]. The centered variable decomposes as u−E[u]=∑α∈Λ∖{0}cαψα+(u−PΛu). The two summands are orthogonal by step 1.1, and expansion of the integral norm square as in step 2.1, followed by [F2], gives the displayed variance identity.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite polynomial-chaos orthogonal projection.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources