How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite data processing for Rényi divergence
Statement
Let be probability vectors on a finite nonempty alphabet and let be a stochastic kernel from to a finite nonempty alphabet . For every , with Rényi divergence as defined in Finite Rényi divergence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and as in the Statement.
Finite Rényi divergence: for , ; a positive -mass at a zero -coordinate makes when , while for it contributes zero.
Finite f-divergence with support conventions: a convex generator defines the closed-perspective sum, with singular term .
Finite stochastic kernels: and are the output laws under the same row-stochastic kernel.
Finite data processing for f-divergences: for every convex generator with its stated boundary convention.
The finite Rényi generators are convex with stated boundary values: for , is convex with recession value ; for , is convex with recession value .
Proof
Suppose . If , [F1] gives , so the claimed inequality holds. If , then : whenever , nonnegativity of the summands gives for every , and implies and hence . For , convexity holds, by [F5], and direct substitution into [F2] gives and the same identity for .
Suppose and take . By [F5] it is convex, , , and . Substitution into [F2] gives , including when has mass outside ; likewise .
By [F4], . The logarithm is increasing and , so dividing the logarithms by preserves the inequality and proves the result for .
By [F4], . If the input affinity is zero, [F1] gives and the conclusion follows. Otherwise both affinities are positive; applying the increasing logarithm and then dividing by reverses the inequality. This proves the claim for .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 7, §§7.1–7.2 and §7.12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tim van Erven and Peter Harremoës, Rényi Divergence and Kullback-Leibler Divergence, §§II-A, II-B, III-A (standard reference, not scraped)