How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Transient hitting, mean exit, and residual bounds
Statement
Let be a finite row-stochastic transition matrix on a finite state set, let be a nonempty subset, and put . Suppose satisfies the escape hypothesis of Finite-step escape from a transient substochastic block with constants and . For each , give a finite first-exit path , with and , the weight . The proof shows these countably many path weights sum to one, so they define a probability distribution on finite first-exit paths. Let , set , and let be the probability that the path exits into ; let be the mean number of transitions to exit. Then and . The matrix exists, has nonnegative entries, and
where is the probability that the first exit from lands in and . The expected number of steps until the first exit from is finite and satisfies ; for any ,
Thus these hitting and mean-exit systems are certified only for a proved transient block; a row-substochastic matrix without the escape hypothesis receives no such conclusion here. The matrix norm is and the vector norm is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite row-stochastic transition matrix , a nonempty transient set , its block , the escape constants , and a boundary target .
Transition matrices and n-step probabilities: the entries of are nonnegative and each source row sums to one.
Finite-step escape from a transient substochastic block: , , and for some and ; in particular .
The finite first-exit paths from have weights ; once their total weight is one, their event probabilities and the mean exit length are the corresponding nonnegative sums.
Proof
Given: and the finite first-exit path weights above.
Proof technique: group the Neumann series into blocks of length , normalize the finite first-exit path weights, and use the tail-sum identity for an integer-valued exit length.
For , substochasticity gives . Since , induction gives for every . Therefore every row sum of is at most , and .
The series converges in the maximum-row-sum norm and has nonnegative entries. The finite partial sums satisfy and . Step 1.1 makes , so is a two-sided inverse of and .
Put , the vector of one-step exit weights from rows of . For each , the total weight of first-exit paths of length at most is . By [F2], this tends to one. The finite-exit path set is countable, so these nonnegative weights define a probability distribution. For paths exiting into after transitions within , finite matrix multiplication gives weight ; summing over yields .
For a path with exit length , the indicator identity holds. Summing against the countable path probability from step 2.2 gives , since both are the same nonnegative double sum indexed by pairs . The total weight of paths still in after transitions is , so . Step 1.1 makes this finite, and multiplying by gives .
From , the operator norm bound in step 2.1 gives the stated hitting-probability residual bound. Applying the same identity to with right side gives the mean-exit residual bound.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles M. Grinstead and J. Laurie Snell, Introduction to Probability, Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)