Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transient hitting, mean exit, and residual bounds

Statement

Let K be a finite row-stochastic transition matrix on a finite state set, let U be a nonempty subset, and put T=KU,U. Suppose T satisfies the escape hypothesis of Finite-step escape from a transient substochastic block with constants L≤∣U∣ and ε>0. For each i∈U, give a finite first-exit path (i=i0,i1,…,ik,j), with i0,…,ik∈U and j∈Uc, the weight ∏r<kKirir+1 Kikj. The proof shows these countably many path weights sum to one, so they define a probability distribution on finite first-exit paths. Let G⊆Uc, set bi=∑j∈GKij, and let hi be the probability that the path exits into G; let ti be the mean number of transitions to exit. Then h=∑k≥0Tkb and t=∑k≥0Tk1. The matrix N=(I−T)−1=∑k=0∞Tk exists, has nonnegative entries, and

∥N∥∞≤L/ε,∥h−h^∥∞≤(L/ε)∥b−(I−T)h^∥∞,

where hi is the probability that the first exit from U lands in G and h=Nb. The expected number ti of steps until the first exit from U is finite and satisfies t=N1; for any t^,

∥t−t^∥∞≤(L/ε)∥1−(I−T)t^∥∞.

Thus these hitting and mean-exit systems are certified only for a proved transient block; a row-substochastic matrix without the escape hypothesis receives no such conclusion here. The matrix norm is ∥A∥∞=max⁡i∑j∣Aij∣ and the vector norm is ∥v∥∞=max⁡i∣vi∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite row-stochastic transition matrix K, a nonempty transient set U, its block T=KU,U, the escape constants L,ε, and a boundary target G⊆Uc.

[F1]

Transition matrices and n-step probabilities: the entries of K are nonnegative and each source row sums to one.

[F2]

Finite-step escape from a transient substochastic block: T≥0, T1≤1, and TL1≤(1−ε)1 for some L≤∣U∣ and ε>0; in particular Tn1→0.

[L1]

The finite first-exit paths from i have weights ∏r<kKirir+1Kikj; once their total weight is one, their event probabilities and the mean exit length are the corresponding nonnegative sums.

Proof

Given: K,U,T,G,L,ε and the finite first-exit path weights above.

Proof technique: group the Neumann series into blocks of length L, normalize the finite first-exit path weights, and use the tail-sum identity for an integer-valued exit length.

1.1givenF2algebrainduction

For 0≤r<L, substochasticity gives Tr1≤1. Since TL1≤(1−ε)1, induction gives (TL)q1≤(1−ε)q1 for every q≥0. Therefore every row sum of TqL+r is at most (1−ε)q, and ∑k≥0∥Tk∥∞≤L∑q≥0(1−ε)q=L/ε.

2.1step 1.1algebra

The series N=∑k≥0Tk converges in the maximum-row-sum norm and has nonnegative entries. The finite partial sums satisfy (I−T)∑k=0mTk=I−Tm+1 and ∑k=0mTk(I−T)=I−Tm+1. Step 1.1 makes Tm+1→0, so N is a two-sided inverse of I−T and ∥N∥∞≤L/ε.

2.2F1F2L1step 1.1algebra

Put d=1−T1, the vector of one-step exit weights from rows of U. For each i, the total weight of first-exit paths of length at most N is ∑k=0N−1(Tkd)i=∑k=0N−1(Tk1−Tk+11)i=1−(TN1)i. By [F2], this tends to one. The finite-exit path set is countable, so these nonnegative weights define a probability distribution. For paths exiting into G after k transitions within U, finite matrix multiplication gives weight (Tkb)i; summing over k yields hi=∑k≥0(Tkb)i=(Nb)i.

3.1F1F2L1step 1.1step 2.2algebra

For a path with exit length τ, the indicator identity τ=∑k≥01{τ>k} holds. Summing against the countable path probability from step 2.2 gives Eiτ=∑k≥0Pr⁡i(τ>k), since both are the same nonnegative double sum indexed by pairs 0≤k<τ. The total weight of paths still in U after k transitions is (Tk1)i, so ti=∑k≥0(Tk1)i=(N1)i. Step 1.1 makes this finite, and multiplying by I−T gives (I−T)t=1.

4.1step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra∎

From h−h^=N(b−(I−T)h^), the operator norm bound in step 2.1 gives the stated hitting-probability residual bound. Applying the same identity to t−t^ with right side 1 gives the mean-exit residual bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources