Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First hypercohomology spectral sequence

Statement

For an additive left-exact functor F and a bounded-below complex K with supplied Cartan–Eilenberg resolution I, there is a spectral sequence E1p,q=RqF(Kp)RIp+qF(K),dr:(p,q)(p+r,qr+1). Here q0 and pb if Kp=0 for p<b. It is first quadrant after translating p by b and converges strongly with a finite filtration on every target degree. Derived objects use the supplied columns; under DC, or supplied Cartan–Eilenberg comparison and homotopy data, it is natural in K and independent of the resolution from E1 onward.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F,K,I,b and the data qualifications in the statement.

[F1]

Hyperderived objects are cohomology of the signed total complex Tot(FI) (Right hyperderived functor of a complex).

[F2]

The cohomological double-complex construction gives vertical-first E1, bidegrees and finite image-filtration convergence (Finite-diagonal cohomological double-complex spectral sequences).

[F3]

Cartan–Eilenberg maps and homotopies give independence from vertical-first E1 with DC or supplied data (Cartan–Eilenberg comparisons preserve both filtrations).

Proof

1.1

In Cp,q=F(Ip,q) filter the signed total complex by the original complex degree p. Its graded column has differential (1)pF(v). The kernel and image of this signed differential equal those of F(v), so the canonical cohomology quotient is Hq(F(Ip,))=RqF(Kp) by the supplied injective resolution of Kp. The differential to the next column is induced by F(h) and hence is RqF(dKp).

F1F2
2.1

Apply finite-diagonal convergence. Its target is Hp+q(Tot(FI))=RIp+qF(K), and the filtration is the image of the cohomology of the subcomplex with columns of degree at least p. In total degree n the filtration is all the target at p=b and zero at p=n+1; below n=b the target vanishes. Translation uses normalized total degree nb.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

For a map of complexes take the comparison of F3, which preserves columns. Its vertical homotopy makes the E1 map independent of the lift, and its total homotopy makes the target map independent as well. Identity and composite comparisons prove naturality. This use requires exactly DC or the supplied comparisons stated above; constructing the sequence for the fixed bicomplex uses no choice. Zero complexes, zero columns and the sole bottom bidegree satisfy the same formulas.

F3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources