How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fisher's inequality: every - design has at least blocks
Statement
Every - design has at least blocks.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A - design with incidence matrix and blocks.
The incidence identity is (For a -design, ).
The counting identities give , with and (A -design satisfies and ).
Proof
From [L2] one gets , because and .
If is nonzero, then [L1] gives by step 1.1. Therefore no nonzero vector satisfies .
So the rows of are linearly independent in . A family of linearly independent vectors in requires .
Remarks
The positivity argument is over . The published false statement FALSE: distinct nonempty whose pairwise intersections all have the same parity satisfy records why the same proof does not survive over .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Noam D. Elkies, Math 155 notes: Jan. 29 (standard reference, not scraped)