Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Floater–Hormann interpolants have no real poles

Statement

For any n≥1, any distinct ordered real nodes x0<⋯<xn, any real data f0,…,fn, and any integer 0≤d<n, the exact Floater–Hormann rational function in Floater–Hormann barycentric interpolant has no real poles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Ordered real nodes x0<⋯<xn, real data, and 0≤d<n.

[F1]

Floater–Hormann weights equal the local-polynomial blend weights: clearing the node factors in the barycentric denominator gives (−1)n−ds(x), where s(x)=∑i=0n−dμi(x) and μi(x)=∏j<i(x−xj)∏k>i+d(xk−x).

[F2]

Floater–Hormann blend partial sums are positive in each node gap: in every open node gap the nonempty partial sums from the three index blocks I1,I2,I3 are positive.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2construct

At a node x=xα, a term μi(xα) vanishes if i>α or i+d<α. Otherwise every factor in μi(xα) is strictly positive. The index set max⁡(0,α−d)≤i≤min⁡(α,n−d) is nonempty, so s(xα)>0.

1.2givenF1F2algebra

Suppose xα<x<xα+1. By [F2], every nonempty block sum over I1,I2,I3 is positive. Their index sets partition {0,…,n−d}, so s(x)>0 throughout each interior node gap.

1.3givenF1algebra

If x<x0, then μ0>0 and the terms in increasing index order alternate in sign with decreasing magnitudes, since μi+1/μi=(x−xi)/(xi+d+1−x)<0 and ∣μi+1/μi∣=(xi−x)/(xi+d+1−x)<1. Pairing from the first term gives s(x)>0. If x>xn, then μn−d>0 and reading backward gives alternating decreasing magnitudes: μi−1/μi=(xi+d−x)/(x−xi−1)<0 and ∣μi−1/μi∣=(x−xi+d)/(x−xi−1)<1. Pairing from the last term again gives s(x)>0.

2.1F1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

The cleared polynomial denominator of the barycentric quotient is a nonzero constant multiple of s by [F1]. Steps 1.1–1.3 show that this polynomial has no real zero. Cancelling common polynomial factors cannot create a real denominator zero, so the reduced rational function has no real poles.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources