How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A verified contour count encloses every Floquet multiplier in a cluster
Statement
If Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters returns certified-count(c) for a nonempty matrix family and a simple positively oriented convex polygon , then every has exactly eigenvalues in , counted with algebraic multiplicity, and no eigenvalue on . In particular, this holds for every exact monodromy matrix enclosed by a validated shooting jet whose interval block is contained in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A successful count record, its outward interval arithmetic, its resolvent-cover result, the matrix family, and the positive polygon.
A successful resolvent-cover validation bounds uniformly on each covered edge and for all (The finite disk cover validator returns a uniform resolvent bound on success).
For an invertible matrix , the determinant derivative in direction is (The determinant differential is at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus).
The argument principle counts zeros of a holomorphic function by the logarithmic-derivative contour integral with winding-number weights (The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle); for the positive convex polygon the index is one inside and zero outside (A positively oriented convex polygon has winding index one inside and zero outside).
Eigenvalues are exactly the roots of the characteristic polynomial (For every finite-dimensional space, is exactly the set of roots in of ). Algebraic multiplicity means the multiplicity of the corresponding polynomial root. The characteristic polynomial of an matrix is monic of degree ( is monic of degree ; for its coefficient is and its constant coefficient is , while ), so it has complex roots counted with multiplicity (A complex polynomial of degree has exactly roots counted with multiplicity).
The identity and the alternating-series remainder bound justify the rational interval for (Principal arctangent: derivative, integral, power series, and the Gregory–Leibniz series, The alternating series test: if is nonincreasing with then converges, the sum lies between any two consecutive partial sums, and the error after terms is at most ); all later endpoint operations are exact rational arithmetic.
The finite procedure verifies the resolvent cover, midpoint subdivisions, sample inverses, error terms and strict integer-neighborhood test before returning a count (Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters).
The complex infinity matrix norm is submultiplicative (The complex infinity matrix norm is compatible and submultiplicative).
Under , a continuously differentiable complex-valued curve whose modulus of the derivative is bounded by changes by at most times the interval length (The mean value inequality: if is continuous and differentiable on with , then ).
Proof
Fix . Along an edge , put . By [F1] this inverse exists and has norm at most . For with , the resolvent identity gives . Thus [F1] and [F7] imply , so is continuous; dividing the identity by and taking the limit gives for interior . Therefore has . Since each diagonal entry is bounded by its row sum, , so [F1] and [F7] give . By [F8], on each subinterval of length , ; hence the integral error on that cell is at most . Summing all cells and edges gives the first term of .
At a sample point, the resolvent identity gives . Therefore . Multiplying by the edge weight and using yields the second term of after summing samples. Thus the exact contour integral lies in the complex disk centered at with radius , simultaneously for every . Exact rational interval endpoint arithmetic and the valid interval [F5] make contain the normalized integral.
For each fixed , put . The boundary is in the resolvent by [F1], so is nonzero on . By [F2] with and direction , . Facts [F3]–[F4] therefore identify with the number of eigenvalues inside , counted with algebraic multiplicity; it is an integer from to .
The successful output places the real part of every such integer strictly inside the half-unit interval around . There is only one integer in that interval, namely . Its imaginary part is zero and is contained by the checked imaginary interval. Hence every has exactly interior eigenvalues and none on the resolvent-certified boundary. If a monodromy matrix lies in , the same universal statement applies to it.
Depends on
- Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters
- The finite disk cover validator returns a uniform resolvent bound on success
- The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle
- A positively oriented convex polygon has winding index one inside and zero outside
- The determinant differential is $D\det(A)[H]=\operatorname{tr}(\operatorname{adj}(A)H)$ at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus
- Principal arctangent: derivative, integral, power series, and the Gregory–Leibniz series
- The alternating series test: if $(b_k)$ is nonincreasing with $b_k \to 0$ then $\sum_{k} (-1)^{k} b_k$ converges, the sum lies between any two consecutive partial sums, and the error after $n$ terms is at most $b_n$
- A complex polynomial of degree $n$ has exactly $n$ roots counted with multiplicity
- For every finite-dimensional space, $\sigma_F(T)$ is exactly the set of roots in $F$ of $\chi_T$
- $\chi_A(x)$ is monic of degree $n$; for $n\geq1$ its $x^{n-1}$ coefficient is $-\operatorname{tr}(A)$ and its constant coefficient is $(-1)^n\det(A)$, while $\chi_{0\times0}=1$
- The complex infinity matrix norm is compatible and submultiplicative
- The mean value inequality: if $f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m$ is continuous and differentiable on $(a,b)$ with $\lVert f'\rVert_2 \le M$, then $\lVert f(b)-f(a)\rVert_2 \le M(b-a)$
Used by
- A near-unit multiplier enclosure does not decide stability Example
- Conditional van der Pol stability from a validated enclosure Example
- Strict Floquet cluster enclosures certify orbital asymptotic stability Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters.
Dependency tree · two levels
93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. M. Rump, Verification methods: Rigorous results using floating-point arithmetic, Acta Numerica 19 (2010) (standard reference, not scraped)