Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A verified contour count encloses every Floquet multiplier in a cluster

Statement

If Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters returns certified-count(c) for a nonempty matrix family M and a simple positively oriented convex polygon Γ, then every M∈M has exactly c eigenvalues in int⁡P, counted with algebraic multiplicity, and no eigenvalue on Γ. In particular, this holds for every exact monodromy matrix enclosed by a validated shooting jet whose interval block is contained in M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A successful count record, its outward interval arithmetic, its resolvent-cover result, the matrix family, and the positive polygon.

[F1]

A successful resolvent-cover validation bounds ∥(zI−M)−1∥∞,C uniformly on each covered edge and for all M∈M (The finite disk cover validator returns a uniform resolvent bound on success).

[F2]

For an invertible matrix A, the determinant derivative in direction H is Ddet⁡(A)[H]=det⁡(A)tr⁡(A−1H) (The determinant differential is Ddet⁡(A)[H]=tr⁡(adj⁡(A)H) at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus).

[F3]

The argument principle counts zeros of a holomorphic function by the logarithmic-derivative contour integral with winding-number weights (The argument principle for an admissible null-homologous cycle); for the positive convex polygon the index is one inside and zero outside (A positively oriented convex polygon has winding index one inside and zero outside).

[F4]

Eigenvalues are exactly the roots of the characteristic polynomial (For every finite-dimensional space, σF(T) is exactly the set of roots in F of χT). Algebraic multiplicity means the multiplicity of the corresponding polynomial root. The characteristic polynomial of an n×n matrix is monic of degree n (χA(x) is monic of degree n; for n≥1 its xn−1 coefficient is −tr⁡(A) and its constant coefficient is (−1)ndet⁡(A), while χ0×0=1), so it has n complex roots counted with multiplicity (A complex polynomial of degree n has exactly n roots counted with multiplicity).

[F6]

The finite procedure verifies the resolvent cover, midpoint subdivisions, sample inverses, error terms and strict integer-neighborhood test before returning a count (Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters).

[F7]

The complex infinity matrix norm is submultiplicative (The complex infinity matrix norm is compatible and submultiplicative).

[F8]

Under C≅R2, a continuously differentiable complex-valued curve whose modulus of the derivative is bounded by L changes by at most L times the interval length (The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]→Rm is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ∥f′∥2≤M, then ∥f(b)−f(a)∥2≤M(b−a)).

Proof

1.1F1F7F8givenalgebra

Fix M∈M. Along an edge z(t)=a+te, put RM(t)=(z(t)I−M)−1. By [F1] this inverse exists and has norm at most m. For h with t,t+h∈[0,1], the resolvent identity gives RM(t+h)−RM(t)=−heRM(t+h)RM(t). Thus [F1] and [F7] imply ∥RM(t+h)−RM(t)∥∞,C≤∣h∣∣e∣m2, so RM is continuous; dividing the identity by h and taking the limit gives RM′(t)=−eRM(t)2 for interior t. Therefore g(t)=etr⁡RM(t) has g′(t)=−e2tr⁡(RM(t)2). Since each diagonal entry is bounded by its row sum, ∣tr⁡A∣≤n∥A∥∞,C, so [F1] and [F7] give ∣g′(t)∣≤n∣e∣2m2. By [F8], on each subinterval of length 1/N, ∣g(t)−g(tmid)∣≤n∣e∣2m2/(2N); hence the integral error on that cell is at most n∣e∣2m2/(2N2). Summing all N cells and edges gives the first term of E.

2.1F1F5F6F7step 1.1algebra

At a sample point, the resolvent identity gives RM−R0=RM(M−M0)R0. Therefore ∣tr⁡(RM−R0)∣≤nmbjkδA. Multiplying by the edge weight and using sj≥∣ej∣ yields the second term of E after summing samples. Thus the exact contour integral ∫Γtr⁡(zI−M)−1dz lies in the complex disk centered at S0 with radius E, simultaneously for every M∈M. Exact rational interval endpoint arithmetic and the valid π interval [F5] make I contain the normalized integral.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 2.1

For each fixed M, put pM(z)=det⁡(zI−M). The boundary is in the resolvent by [F1], so pM is nonzero on Γ. By [F2] with A=zI−M and direction I, pM′(z)/pM(z)=tr⁡(zI−M)−1. Facts [F3]–[F4] therefore identify (2πi)−1∫Γtr⁡(zI−M)−1dz with the number of eigenvalues inside P, counted with algebraic multiplicity; it is an integer from 0 to n.

4.1F5F6step 3.1∎

The successful output places the real part of every such integer strictly inside the half-unit interval around c. There is only one integer in that interval, namely c. Its imaginary part is zero and is contained by the checked imaginary interval. Hence every M has exactly c interior eigenvalues and none on the resolvent-certified boundary. If a monodromy matrix lies in M, the same universal statement applies to it.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Finite complex-contour validation of Floquet multiplier clusters.

Dependency tree · two levels

93 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources