Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The five-case resolvent classification of an irreducible quartic Galois group

Statement

Let fF[x] be a monic irreducible separable quartic over a field of characteristic not two, let Rf be its resolvent cubic, let M be the splitting field of Rf, and let Δ=Disc(f). Exactly one row applies:

  1. An irreducible separable quartic with irreducible resolvent and nonsquare discriminant has Galois group S4.
  2. An irreducible separable quartic with irreducible resolvent and square discriminant has Galois group A4.
  3. If Rf splits completely over F, then the group is V4.
  4. If Rf has exactly one root in F and f remains irreducible over M, then the group is D4.
  5. If Rf has exactly one root in F and f is reducible over M, then the group is C4.

In the unique-root resolvent branch, irreducibility over the resolvent splitting field distinguishes D4 from C4.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

The transitive subgroups of S4 are S4,A4,D4,C4, and V4, with the stated action on the three pairings (The transitive subgroups of S4 and their action on the three pairings).

[L2]

A monic quartic and its resolvent cubic have the same discriminant (The coefficient formula and discriminant of the quartic resolvent).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let L be the splitting field of f and G=Gal(L/F)S4. Irreducibility makes G transitive. The kernel of its action on the three pairing roots is GV4 by [L1]. The field generated by those roots is M, so the Galois correspondence identifies M=LGV4.

L1given
2.1

If Rf is irreducible, its pairing action is transitive, so [L1] leaves S4 or A4; by [L2] and the discriminant criterion, nonsquare Δ gives S4 and square Δ gives A4. If Rf splits completely, the pairing action is trivial and transitivity on four roots forces G=V4. If Rf has exactly one root in F, its other two roots form one orbit, so the pairing image is C2 and [L1] leaves D4 or C4. A cubic cannot have exactly two roots in F, and [L2] plus separability makes the resolvent separable, so these branches are exhaustive.

step 1.1L1L2given
3.1

In the unique-root branch, Gal(L/M)=GV4. For G=D4 this intersection is V4, which acts transitively on the four roots, so f remains irreducible over M. For G=C4 the intersection has order two and two root orbits, so f factors over M. The transitivity criterion proves both implications and completes the five-case classification.

step 2.1L1given

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources