Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

With a Hermitian matrix, Arnoldi collapses to the Lanczos three-term recurrence and a real symmetric tridiagonal projection

Statement

Let A be Hermitian, and run Arnoldi on (A,b) through step m without breakdown. Write

AQm=Qm+1Hˉm,Qm=[q1 … qm].

Then there exist real numbers α1,…,αm and nonnegative real numbers β1,…,βm such that

Aqj=βj−1qj−1+αjqj+βjqj+1(1≤j≤m, q0:=0, β0:=0).

Moreover, Tm:=Qm∗AQm is a real symmetric tridiagonal matrix.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Hermitian matrix A and an Arnoldi run through step m without breakdown.

[F1]

The Lanczos process is Arnoldi specialized to a Hermitian matrix, with the phase chosen so that the subdiagonal coefficients are real and nonnegative (The Lanczos process as Arnoldi specialized to a Hermitian matrix, with the usual real-subdiagonal phase convention).

[L1]

Arnoldi yields an orthonormal basis and an upper-Hessenberg factorization AQm=Qm+1Hˉm, with column relations Aqj=∑i=1j+1hijqi (Before breakdown, Arnoldi produces an orthonormal Krylov basis and a rectangular upper-Hessenberg factorization).

[L2]

An upper-Hessenberg matrix has hij=0 for i>j+1, and a real symmetric tridiagonal matrix has zeros whenever ∣i−j∣>1 (Upper Hessenberg matrices and real symmetric tridiagonal matrices).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2algebra

Fix j and let i≤j−2. By [L1], Aqi lies in span⁡{q1,…,qi+1}, which is orthogonal to qj. Since A is Hermitian, hij=qi∗Aqj=(Aqi)∗qj=0. Together with the upper-Hessenberg zero pattern from [L2], this shows that the only possibly nonzero coefficients in column j are hj−1,j, hjj, and hj+1,j. Therefore each Arnoldi column relation collapses to a three-term recurrence.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Hermitian symmetry also gives hj,j−1=hj−1,j‾. Under the phase convention in [F1], the subdiagonal coefficients hj+1,j are real and nonnegative; write βj:=hj+1,j and αj:=hjj. Since hjj=qj∗Aqj equals its own complex conjugate, each αj is real. Hence Aqj=βj−1qj−1+αjqj+βjqj+1, which is the Lanczos recurrence.

3.1L2step 1.1step 2.1∎

The projected matrix is Tm=Qm∗AQm=(qi∗Aqj)i,j=(hij)1≤i,j≤m. Step 1.1 shows hij=0 for ∣i−j∣>1, and Hermitian symmetry together with the reality from step 2.1 shows hij=hji∈R on the remaining bands. Thus Tm is a real symmetric tridiagonal matrix in the sense of [L2].

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Lanczos process as Arnoldi specialized to a Hermitian matrix, with the usual real-subdiagonal phase convention.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources