How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Nonzero cellular heads classify the simple modules over a field
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional cellular algebra over a field , with finite cell poset . For , let and its symmetric invariant form be as in Cell modules, their forms, and radicals, and put Then every nonzero is absolutely simple, the nonzero are pairwise nonisomorphic, and they form a complete set of simple right -modules up to isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional cellular algebra over with finite cell poset and the modules and forms in the Statement.
Cell modules, their forms, and radicals: each is a right module; its form is symmetric and invariant; the radical is a submodule; and cell-layer multiplication defines that form.
Cell data, multipartition dominance, and higher-cell ideals: and are two-sided ideals, with their indicated cell-basis spans.
Finite matrix and module preliminaries: right inverses, rank invariance, finite length and nilpotent trace: a finite-dimensional vector space has finite bases, kernels, and quotients; scalar extension of a finite matrix preserves its rank when the scalar extension is a field extension.
Proof
Given: The data in the Statement.
For , the rank-one multiplication identity of [F1] gives If the form is not identically zero, its radical is proper and . For any there is with . Every submodule of containing such an contains each basis vector , because the action identity is exact and division by the nonzero field scalar gives . Thus every submodule not contained in the radical is all of , and the quotient is simple.
Let be any field extension. The Gram matrix of the form has the same rank over as over : its rank is characterized by the largest nonzero minor, and a minor in vanishes in exactly when it already vanished in . Hence , and is nonzero whenever is. Step 1.1, applied over , proves it simple. Thus it remains simple after every field extension, which is absolute simplicity.
Suppose , so the form on is not identically zero. Let be a proper submodule of and suppose is nonzero. There is an with : otherwise, for a fixed outside the radical, each radical vector is the difference of two vectors outside the radical, so would vanish on the whole module. Choose with and define . The rank-one identity gives , so . If , then : a basis shape in the intersection is above both labels, and it cannot equal without implying . For any cell basis representative of a vector in , multiplying by lies in both ideals, so it acts as zero in . Thus every , contradicting . Therefore a nonzero map of this kind forces .
If and are nonzero and isomorphic, compose the quotient map with the isomorphism to obtain a nonzero map . Step 2.2 gives . Reversing the roles gives . Antisymmetry of the cell poset implies .
Choose a linear extension of the finite poset in which every maximal remaining element is listed next. The prefix is upward closed, so is an ideal: it is the sum of the ideals for . Also , because every label strictly above occurs earlier. Let be a simple right -module. Since , choose the least with . Then and , so and . Choose and such that for some ; this is possible because and the cell basis spans that ideal. Define by . For , the cell axiom gives modulo ; that higher ideal annihilates , so . The map is a nonzero module map and hence surjective. Choose with . The annihilator is a submodule because is a two-sided ideal. It is proper since , so simplicity makes it zero. Hence ; since , some cell basis element acts nontrivially on . If the form on were zero, the rank-one action identity would give , contradicting the module-map identity . Thus the form is nonzero and its radical is proper. By step 1.1, every proper submodule of is contained in its radical; since is maximal, it equals the radical. Therefore .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Mathas, Hecke algebras and Schur algebras of the symmetric group, complete author-uploaded preliminary lecture manuscript (1998) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard Dipper, Gordon James, and Andrew Mathas, Cyclotomic q-Schur algebras, Mathematische Zeitschrift 229 (1998), 385–416 (standard reference, not scraped)