How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-DMC dependence-testing achievability bound
Statement
Let be the block channel of a finite DMC, let be any input law, and let . Define the charged information density on the support of . There is a deterministic length- code with messages and average error at most where . For , a zero-error code exists. The conclusion is an average-error bound and does not by itself bound every message's error.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite DMC, its product block kernel , an input law , and an integer .
Finite discrete memoryless channels and The DMC product laws are stochastic kernels: the block law is and is a stochastic kernel.
Finite DMC information density: information density is the natural-log likelihood ratio between the channel output law given the input and the output marginal, evaluated on charged support.
Fixed-length codes for a finite DMC and Average and maximal error of a fixed-length code: a code has a deterministic encoder and decoder, and its average error is the uniform-message average of its message errors.
Proof
Draw codewords independently from . Put and . For decoder tests extend to whenever ; on its positive support , so the stated logarithm is finite. The decoder selects the lowest index for which ; if no index passes, it outputs message . This defines a deterministic code decoder for each realized codebook.
If message is sent, an error can occur only if its own test fails or an earlier codeword passes. Thus its conditional error is at most The first probability averaged over the true codeword and output is . Each earlier independent codeword and the true output have law , so its averaged term is .
Averaging over the uniform message index gives ensemble-average error at most because . On the event , the likelihood ratio identity gives . Therefore this bound equals .
The finite random codebook ensemble has some realization whose average error is no larger than its expectation; otherwise every realization would exceed the ensemble average. With , this realization proves the stated bound. A one-message code has no decoding error.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy, H. Vincent Poor, and Sergio Verdú, Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 18 §18.3 (standard reference, not scraped)