Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Channel data processing for finite quantum relative entropy

Statement

Let H,K be nonzero finite-dimensional complex inner-product spaces, let Φ:L(H)→L(K) be a quantum channel (Finite-dimensional quantum channel), and let A,B be non-negative operators on H. Then

D(Φ(A)∥Φ(B))≤D(A∥B).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The spaces, channel and non-negative operators in the Statement.

[F1]

Kraus and Choi characterizations of complete positivity: a finite-dimensional completely positive map has a finite Kraus representation.

[F2]

Finite Kraus representation: a Kraus representation has the form Φ(X)=∑jKjXKj∗ on the full operator space.

[F3]

Trace preservation is Kraus normalization: trace preservation is equivalent to ∑jKj∗Kj=IH.

[F4]

Partial-trace data processing for finite quantum relative entropy: partial trace over a nonzero finite factor does not increase QRE.

[F5]

Isometric invariance of finite quantum relative entropy: simultaneous isometric conjugation preserves QRE.

[F6]

Partial trace over a finite tensor factor: partial trace over the environment removes the matching diagonal Kraus blocks and retains the output operator.

[F7]

The adjoint T∗:W→V is characterised by ⟨Tv,w⟩W=⟨v,T∗w⟩V: ⟨Kx,Ky⟩=⟨x,K∗Ky⟩ under the repository's inner-product convention.

[F8]

Finite registers and their ordered computational bases: the standard register E=Cr has the specified ordered orthonormal basis (fj).

Proof

1.1givenF1F2F3F7F8construct

By [F1]–[F2], choose a finite Kraus family (Kj)j<r for Φ. Since H≠{0} and [F3] gives ∑jKj∗Kj=IH, the family is nonempty. Let E=Cr with the ordered orthonormal basis (fj) from [F8], and define V:H→K⊗E by Vx:=∑j<rKjx⊗fj. For x,y∈H, orthonormality and [F3], [F7] give ⟨Vx,Vy⟩=∑j⟨Kjx,Kjy⟩=⟨x,(∑jKj∗Kj)y⟩=⟨x,y⟩; hence V∗V=IH.

2.1givenF2F6F8step 1.1algebra

Expanding in the environment basis [F8] gives VXV∗=∑j,kKjXKk∗⊗Mjk, where Mjkz=⟨z,fk⟩fj. The partial-trace formula [F6] keeps exactly the terms j=k, so Tr⁡E(VXV∗)=∑jKjXKj∗=Φ(X) for every X.

3.1givenF4F5step 2.1algebra∎

Apply isometric invariance [F5] and then partial-trace data processing [F4] to the pair (VAV∗,VBV∗) on K⊗E. By step 2.1, D(Φ(A)∥Φ(B))=D(Tr⁡E(VAV∗)∥Tr⁡E(VBV∗))≤D(VAV∗∥VBV∗)=D(A∥B).

Remarks

The finite Stinespring dilation used in the proof is summarized by the following map diagram. It records the factor that is discarded by the partial trace; the proof relies on the Kraus and trace calculations above, not on the diagram.

L(H)L(K¬E)L(K)X7!VXV¤PhioperatornameTrE

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources