How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform entropy approximation for type-class sizes
Statement
For a fixed finite alphabet of size , uniformly over every -type , Consequently, uniformly over as .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite alphabet , , and an attainable type for each .
Polynomially sharp bounds for type-class cardinality: for every -type .
Finite distributions, entropy, divergence, and stochastic matrices: is finite and uses the natural logarithm.
Proof
Each type class is nonempty because is attainable, so . Taking natural logarithms in [F1] gives .
Divide by and subtract from to get the uniform error interval in the statement. For , [F3] and give , hence . The bound is independent of , so convergence is uniform.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, author-hosted book draft (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, second edition, Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)