How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The canonical map to the profinite completion has kernel equal to the finite residual and has dense image
Statement
The canonical map has kernel equal to the finite residual of , and its image is dense in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An abstract group with profinite completion and canonical map .
The profinite completion is the inverse limit of the quotients , and is the intersection of the finite-index normal subgroups (The profinite completion is the inverse limit of the finite quotients G over N, The canonical map sends g to its coherent system of residue classes, The finite residual is the intersection of the finite-index normal subgroups, and a group is residually finite when that intersection is trivial).
The completion carries the inverse-limit topology from its finite discrete quotients (The profinite completion is the inverse limit of the finite quotients G over N).
Proof
An element lies in exactly when every coordinate is the identity coset in . That is equivalent to for every finite-index normal subgroup . By [L1], this means precisely .
By [L2], let be a nonempty basic open set of . Then fixes finitely many coordinates, say at , to compatible cosets . Let , which is again finite-index normal. Compatibility means exactly that these finitely many coordinates come from one coset in . Since , the image of in is the prescribed coset for each . Therefore .
Step 1.2 says that every nonempty basic open set meets , so the image is dense. Together with step 1.1, this proves the theorem.
Depends on
Used by
- The canonical map is injective exactly when the group is residually finite Corollary
- A finite group is canonically isomorphic to its profinite completion Example
- The integers sit densely but not closedly inside their profinite completion Example
- The profinite completion of the integers is the inverse limit of the rings Z mod n Example
- FALSE: the canonical map to the profinite completion is always injective False statement
- The profinite completion is initial among continuous homomorphisms from G to profinite groups Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brian Osserman, Math 6112 notes on inverse limits and profinite groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- H. W. Lenstra, Profinite groups and Galois groups (standard reference, not scraped)