How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Koebe's growth theorem
Statement
If and , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A function and a point with .
Koebe's distortion theorem gives for every (Koebe's distortion theorem).
Proof
Write . Since , Therefore
For the lower bound, choose on for which is minimal. The segment from to lies in : otherwise its first exit point from would be an image of the circle having modulus strictly smaller than . Since is univalent, this segment has a lift from to .
Applying [L1] inside the integral gives
The image of is a straight segment, so [L1] gives The penultimate inequality follows because joins radius to radius , while the integrand is positive and depends only on the radius.
Minimality of now gives for every . Together with step 2.1 this proves both bounds.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Matthias Weber, Complex Analysis, Theorem 7.5.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Walter Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, Ch. 14 (standard reference, not scraped)