How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Koopman operators are linear isometries
Statement
For a measure-preserving system and , is a well-defined linear isometry on real or complex . It is surjective for an invertible system, and also for a system invertible modulo null sets in the invariant-restriction convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Koopman is pullback on a.e. classes The Koopman operator.
Pullback preserves nonnegative integrals Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps.
The norm is the least essential bound The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound.
The real Lp norm and quotient operations are well-defined The norm descends to the quotient and makes a normed space for .
Complex Lp has the stated quotient operations and norm Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm.
An invertible system has a measurable inverse, either everywhere or on the specified conull restriction Invertible measure-preserving systems.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.
Composition with measurable is measurable. If outside a measurable null set , then outside , which is measurable and null. Thus pullback respects the a.e. equivalence relation used to define .
For , integral invariance applied to the nonnegative function gives . Thus the pullback belongs to and preserves the norm, including at .
For every , has the same measure as . The sets of finite essential bounds therefore coincide, so their infima coincide. The least-essential-bound result applies to the real modulus, proving membership and equality of the infinity norms.
Pointwise, . The real and complex quotient norm theorems make these the quotient vector operations. Together with steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 this proves linear isometry.
For an actual measurable inverse , is measurable and . Thus preserves measure. Both compositions and are the identity, so is onto.
In the modulo-null case restrict to the measurable conull invariant of the definition. For measurable , differs from its restricted inverse image only within , so the restricted map preserves restricted measure. Step 4.1 applies there. For any measurable on , compose with the restricted inverse and extend by zero on . This extension is measurable, has the same Lp norm as , and pulls back to on . It supplies a preimage class.
Depends on
- The Koopman operator
- Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps
- The $L^p$ norm descends to the quotient and makes $L^p$ a normed space for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound
- Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm
- Invertible measure-preserving systems
Used by
- The Koopman matrix for a two-point swap Example
- Mixing correlations extend to L2 functions Proposition
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Koopman operator.
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Einsiedler–Ward §2.4 opening, pp.28–29 (isometry paragraph, not Lemma 2.18) (standard reference, not scraped)