Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Koopman operators are linear isometries

Statement

For a measure-preserving system and 1p, UT is a well-defined linear isometry on real or complex Lp. It is surjective for an invertible system, and also for a system invertible modulo null sets in the invariant-restriction convention.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Koopman is pullback on a.e. classes The Koopman operator.

[F2]

Pullback preserves nonnegative integrals Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps.

[F3]
[F5]

Complex Lp has the stated quotient operations and norm Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm.

[F6]

An invertible system has a measurable inverse, either everywhere or on the specified conull restriction Invertible measure-preserving systems.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

Composition with measurable T is measurable. If f=g outside a measurable null set N, then fT=gT outside T1N, which is measurable and null. Thus pullback respects the a.e. equivalence relation used to define UT.

F1given
2.1

For p<, integral invariance applied to the nonnegative function fp gives fTpp=fpT=fp=fpp. Thus the pullback belongs to Lp and preserves the norm, including at p=1.

F2step 1.1
2.2

For every M0, {fT>M}=T1{f>M} has the same measure as {f>M}. The sets of finite essential bounds therefore coincide, so their infima coincide. The least-essential-bound result applies to the real modulus, proving membership and equality of the infinity norms.

F3step 1.1
3.1

Pointwise, (αf+βg)T=α(fT)+β(gT). The real and complex quotient norm theorems make these the quotient vector operations. Together with steps 1.1, 2.1 and 2.2 this proves linear isometry.

F4F5step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

For an actual measurable inverse S=T1, TE=S1E is measurable and μ(TE)=μ(T1(TE))=μ(E). Thus S preserves measure. Both compositions UTUS and USUT are the identity, so UT is onto.

F6step 3.1
5.1

In the modulo-null case restrict to the measurable conull invariant X0 of the definition. For measurable EX0, T1E differs from its restricted inverse image only within XX0, so the restricted map preserves restricted measure. Step 4.1 applies there. For any measurable f on X, compose fX0 with the restricted inverse and extend by zero on XX0. This extension is measurable, has the same Lp norm as f, and pulls back to f on X0. It supplies a preimage class.

F6step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The Koopman operator.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources