Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kuratowski-Wojdyslawski embedding theorem

Statement

Let (M,d) be a bounded nonempty metric space. Then there is a Banach space B and an isometric embedding ι:M→B such that ι[M] is closed in its algebraic convex hull.

Concretely, one may take B=Cb(M) with the supremum norm and ι=Ko for any basepoint o∈M.

Consequently, every metrizable space embeds homeomorphically as a closed subset of a convex subset of a Banach space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded nonempty metric space (M,d), a basepoint o∈M, and the based Kuratowski map Ko:M→Cb(M).

[L1]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2choose

The target Cb(M) is Banach for the supremum norm. Indeed, let (fn) be a Cauchy sequence in the supremum norm. Then each scalar sequence (fn(z))n is Cauchy, so define f(z):=lim⁡nfn(z). Fix N with ∥fn−fm∥∞<1 for n,m≥N; letting m→∞ gives ∣f(z)∣≤∥fN∥∞+1 for all z, so f is bounded. Given ε>0, fix N with ∥fn−fm∥∞<ε for n,m≥N; letting m→∞ yields ∥fn−f∥∞≤ε for n≥N, so fn→f uniformly. By [L2], f is continuous. Hence every Cauchy sequence converges in Cb(M).

2.1L1step 1.1

By [L1], Ko is an isometric embedding of M into the Banach space Cb(M).

3.1step 2.1algebra

Let f=∑j=1mλjKo(xj) be a point of the algebraic convex hull of Ko[M], so each λj≥0 and ∑jλj=1. Put Δ:=∑i=1m∑j=1mλiλjd(xi,xj). If Δ=0, then every pair with λiλj>0 satisfies d(xi,xj)=0, hence all support points coincide and f=Ko(xj) lies in the image.

4.1step 3.1algebra

Assume Δ>0, and let y∈M. Evaluating at y gives f(y)−Ko(y)(y)=∑j=1mλjd(xj,y). For each i,j, the triangle inequality yields d(xi,xj)≤d(xi,y)+d(y,xj). Multiplying by λiλj and summing over i,j gives Δ≤2∑j=1mλjd(xj,y)=2(f(y)−Ko(y)(y)). Therefore ∥f−Ko(y)∥∞≥f(y)−Ko(y)(y)≥Δ2>0. Since this holds for every y∈M, the distance from f to Ko[M] is at least Δ/2. So no such f lies in the closure of Ko[M].

5.1step 3.1step 4.1

Steps 3.1 and 4.1 show that every point of the algebraic convex hull that lies in the closure of Ko[M] is already in Ko[M]. Thus Ko[M] is closed in its algebraic convex hull.

6.1L3L4step 1.1step 2.1step 5.1choose∎

For the final claim, let (X,T) be metrizable. If X=∅, the unique map ∅→{0} into any Banach space is a homeomorphic embedding, and its image is closed in its algebraic convex hull. Assume now that X≠∅. By [L4], choose a metric d inducing T. By [L3], the bounded metric db=d/(1+d) induces the same topology. Applying steps 1.1 to 5.1 to (X,db) gives an isometric embedding into a Banach space whose image is closed in its algebraic convex hull. Because d and db are topologically equivalent, that same map is a homeomorphic embedding for the original topology T.

Remarks

  • The closedness conclusion is relative to the algebraic convex hull. The proof above shows exactly why it need not be a statement about the whole Banach space.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources