How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Laplacian equals for every oriented incidence matrix
Statement
Let be a finite simple graph, let be any oriented incidence matrix of , and let be its Laplacian matrix. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph with oriented incidence matrix and Laplacian matrix .
Each column of has one entry , one entry , and all other entries (An oriented incidence matrix of a finite simple graph).
The Laplacian has diagonal entries equal to vertex degrees and off-diagonal entries on adjacent pairs and otherwise (The Laplacian matrix of a finite simple graph).
Proof
The entry of is . By [F1], the term is exactly when the edge is incident with , and is otherwise. Therefore is the number of edges incident with , namely by [F2].
For , the entry receives a nonzero contribution only from edges incident with both and . In a simple graph there is at most one such edge. If and are not adjacent, the sum is . If they are adjacent, the unique common edge contributes or , hence . So by [F2].
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that every entry of matches the corresponding entry of , so the matrices are equal.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard P. Stanley, MIT 18.314 handout, Lemma 1.6(a) (standard reference, not scraped)