Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Left and right divisibility extend to lattice orders on the braid group

Statement

Let n∈N, let Bn be the Artin braid group of The braid group by Artin presentation, identified with the group of fractions of the positive braid monoid Bn+ by The group of fractions of the positive braid monoid is the Artin braid group, so that Bn+ is a submonoid of Bn; let Δ be the half twist and let ≼L,≼R be the monoid orders of Left and right divisibility for positive braids. Define, for x,y∈Bn, x≼Ly:⟺x−1y∈Bn+,x≼Ry:⟺yx−1∈Bn+. Then:

(a) The left order. ≼L is a partial order on Bn; it is invariant under left multiplication by every element of Bn (zx≼Lzy  ⟺  x≼Ly); and it extends the monoid order: for a,b∈Bn+ one has a≼Lb  ⟺  a≼Lmonb, and likewise a≼Lb  ⟺  b=ac for some c∈Bn+.

(b) The left order is a lattice. Every pair x,y∈Bn has a least upper bound x∨Ly and a greatest lower bound x∧Ly for ≼L. Explicitly, if K is such that both Δ2Kx and Δ2Ky are positive, then x∨Ly=Δ−2K((Δ2Kx)∨L(Δ2Ky)),x∧Ly=Δ−2K((Δ2Kx)∧L(Δ2Ky)), where the inner joins and meets are those of Positive braids have left and right gcds and lcms, and the result is independent of the choice of K. Moreover the left translations are lattice automorphisms: z(x∨Ly)=zx∨Lzy and z(x∧Ly)=zx∧Lzy for all x,y,z∈Bn. For positive a,b, both a∨Lb and a∧Lb are positive and coincide with the monoid join and meet.

(c) The right order. ≼R is a partial order on Bn, invariant under right multiplication, extending the monoid order ≼R on Bn+, and related to the left order by inversion: x≼Ry  ⟺  y−1≼Lx−1. Consequently the right order is also a lattice: x∨Ry=(x−1∧Ly−1)−1 and x∧Ry=(x−1∨Ly−1)−1, and right translations are its lattice automorphisms.

No choice principle is used; all shifts are by the central element Δ2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural number n, the braid group Bn with its submonoid Bn+ of positive braids, the half twist Δ, and the two extensions of the divisibility orders defined above.

[F1]

Fractions and positivity. By The group of fractions of the positive braid monoid is the Artin braid group every element of Bn is ab−1 with a,b∈Bn+, once the positive monoid is regarded as a submonoid of Bn through its embedding; from now on we use that identification and write Bn+⊆Bn. The only invertible element of Bn+ is 1 (Positive artin relations preserve homogeneous length).

[F2]

Δ-powers and centrality. For every b∈Bn+ there is m with b≼LΔm, and Δ2 is central in Bn+, hence in Bn; for even exponents 2k the element Δ2k is therefore central in Bn (Every positive braid divides a power of the half twist on both sides, Conjugation by the half twist reverses Artin generators).

[F3]

Monoid lattice. For all a,b∈Bn+ the monoid join a∨Lb and monoid meet a∧Lb exist, are positive, and satisfy: a∨Lb is the least common upper bound and a∧Lb the greatest common lower bound for ≼L (Positive braids have left and right gcds and lcms).

[F4]

Monoid order. For a,b∈Bn+: a≼Lb  ⟺  ∃c∈Bn+ (b=ac), and a≼Lb⇒ℓ(a)≤ℓ(b) (Left and right divisibility for positive braids).

[F5]

Cancellation (The positive braid monoid is left and right cancellative): xa=xb implies a=b, and ax=bx implies a=b, for all a,b,x∈Bn+.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Large even shifts make an element positive. Let x∈Bn and write x=ab−1 with a,b∈Bn+ by [F1]. By [F2] choose an even 2k with b≼LΔ2k, say Δ2k=bc; then b−1=cΔ−2k, so x=(ac)Δ−2k, and for every K≥k, centrality of Δ2k [F2] gives Δ2Kx=Δ2K(ac)Δ−2k=Δ2(K−k) (ac)∈Bn+. Hence there are arbitrarily large even powers of Δ multiplying x into Bn+.

F1F2
1.2

The left order. The relation x≼Ly  ⟺  x−1y∈Bn+ is reflexive since x−1x=1∈Bn+, transitive because (x−1y)(y−1z)=x−1z is a product of positive elements, and antisymmetric because if x−1y and y−1x are both positive then they are inverse to each other in Bn, and the only invertible positive element is 1 [F1], so x=y. It is invariant under left multiplication: (zx)−1(zy)=x−1y. For a,b∈Bn+ it agrees with the monoid order, since a−1b∈Bn+ holds if and only if b=a(a−1b) with a−1b positive by [F4], and conversely b=ac with c positive gives a−1b=c.

F1F4
1.3

Scaling a monoid meet by a positive element. Let D,A,B∈Bn+ and let A∧LB be the monoid meet of [F3]. Then

D(A∧LB)=(DA)∧L(DB). Indeed D(A∧LB) is a common left divisor of DA and DB: A∧LB≼LA gives DA=D(A∧LB)c with c∈Bn+, and symmetrically for B. Conversely let d≼LDA and d≼LDB. The monoid join d∨LD exists by [F3] and is a common upper bound of d and of D, so d∨LD is a common left divisor of the pair DA,DB of upper bounds, hence d∨LD≼LDA and d∨LD≼LDB by leastness. Since D≼Ld∨LD, write d∨LD=Dq with q∈Bn+ [F4]. Then DA=(d∨LD)s=Dqs with s∈Bn+, so left cancellation [F5] gives A=qs, that is, q≼LA; the same argument gives q≼LB, so q≼LA∧LB by [F3]. Multiplying by D on the left, d≼Ld∨LD=Dq≼LD(A∧LB). Hence D(A∧LB) is the greatest common left divisor of DA and DB, as claimed. [F3, F4, F5, given]

2.1

Joins. Let x,y∈Bn and choose K with X:=Δ2Kx and Y:=Δ2Ky positive, as in step 1.1; put u:=Δ−2K(X∨LY), where X∨LY is the monoid join of [F3]. Then u is an upper bound: X∨LY=Xc with c∈Bn+ by [F3], so u=Δ−2KXc=xc and x≼Lu, and symmetrically y≼Lu. It is the least one: if x≼Lz and y≼Lz, say z=xp=yq with p,q∈Bn+, then Δ2Kz=Xp=Yq is a common upper bound of X and Y in the monoid order, so X∨LY≼LΔ2Kz, say Δ2Kz=(X∨LY)r with r∈Bn+; hence z=Δ−2K(X∨LY)r=ur and u≼Lz. Thus u=x∨Ly exists.

F1F3step 1.2
3.1

Meets. With the notation of step 2.1, put v:=Δ−2K(X∧LY). Then v is a lower bound: X∧LY≼LX, say X=(X∧LY)c with c positive, so x=Δ−2KX=Δ−2K(X∧LY)c=vc and v≼Lx, and symmetrically v≼Ly. Let w≼Lx,y be any lower bound. By step 1.1 choose K′≥K with W:=Δ2K′w positive. Then x=wp, y=wq with p,q positive, so X′:=Δ2K′x=Wp and Y′:=Δ2K′y=Wq are positive and W is a common left divisor of X′ and Y′ in the monoid order; hence W≼LX′∧LY′ by [F3]. Put D:=Δ2(K′−K); by the power rule X′=DX and Y′=DY, and D∈Bn+, so step 1.3 gives X′∧LY′=(DX)∧L(DY)=D(X∧LY)=Δ2K′Δ−2K(X∧LY)=Δ2K′v. Thus W≼LΔ2K′v, say Δ2K′v=Wr with r∈Bn+. Multiplying on the left by Δ−2K′ and regrouping gives v=(Δ−2K′W)r=wr, because Δ−2K′W=Δ−2K′Δ2K′w=w; hence w≼Lv. Therefore v is the greatest lower bound of x and y.

F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 1.3
4.1

Independence of the shift, and the lattice laws. Let D:=Δ2(K′−K) with K′≥K and X,Y positive. Left multiplication by D is a bijection of Bn preserving and reflecting ≼L by the computation of step 1.2, hence it is an order isomorphism and carries the least upper bound of X,Y to that of DX,DY: D(X∨LY)=(DX)∨L(DY), and dually D(X∧LY)=(DX)∧L(DY). Applying this to step 2.1 and step 1.3 shows that the elements u and v defined there do not depend on K; and the same order-isomorphism property for an arbitrary z∈Bn gives z(x∨Ly)=zx∨Lzy and z(x∧Ly)=zx∧Lzy because left multiplication by z is an order isomorphism of Bn.

F1step 1.2step 2.1step 1.3step 3.1
5.1

Positive pairs and the right order. If a,b∈Bn+, then a∨Lb as computed in step 2.1 with K=0 is the monoid join, hence positive, and by uniqueness of least upper bounds it coincides with the monoid join; the same holds for the meet, which is what the last sentence of (b) asserts. For the right order, note first that x≼Ry  ⟺  yx−1∈Bn+  ⟺  y−1≼Lx−1, because (y−1)−1x−1=yx−1; inversion is an involution of Bn exchanging the two sides, so it carries the partial order ≼L to a partial order, and it is invariant under right multiplication because x≼Ry implies xz≼Ryz for every z, by yzz−1x−1=yx−1. Since inversion reverses products, it turns joins into meets, so x∨Ry=(x−1∧Ly−1)−1 and x∧Ry=(x−1∨Ly−1)−1 exist by steps 2.1 and 3.1 and right translations are lattice automorphisms. On positives, a≼Rb  ⟺  ρ(a)≼Lρ(b) is the monoid right order by the definition of ρ and of ≼R, which is the asserted extension.

F1F3step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

Assembly. Part (a) is step 1.2, part (b) is steps 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1 together with the first half of step 5.1, and part (c) is the second half of step 5.1. The only use of the half twist is through the large even shifts of step 1.1 and the centrality of its square, so no odd conjugation is used; the hypothesis K≥k in step 1.1 is exactly what makes the shifted elements positive. For n≤1 the group is trivial and all statements are vacuous. All constructions are explicit and no choice principle is used. ∎

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Remarks

  • Why even shifts. Step 1.1 needs Δ2k central to move it across a positive element. The odd powers are not central for n≥3: conjugation by Δ acts as the index reversal σi↦σn−i (Conjugation by the half twist reverses Artin generators), so the even powers give central shifts for the fraction computation in step 1.1. Odd positive powers also preserve positivity on positive inputs; centrality, rather than positivity, is the reason for choosing even powers in the displayed lattice formula.
  • The meet is where the extra argument is needed. For the join, step 2.1 transports a common upper bound directly. For the meet, a lower bound w need not itself be positive, so step 3.1 first shifts it into Bn+ by a larger even power, compares inside the monoid lattice using the scaling identity of step 1.3, and then shifts back; this is the place where the hypothesis that the shift is large enough for three elements (not just x,y) is used.
  • Comparison with GM. GM write: "The above properties imply that the partial order ≼ (respectively ≽) can be extended to Bn in the following way: a≼b (resp. b≽a) if and only if ac=b (resp. b=ca) for some c∈Bn+. This gives a partial order which is invariant under left-multiplication (resp. right-multiplication), and which admits unique least common multiples and greatest common divisors." Steps 1.2--5.1 supply the details: the definition with x−1y, the lattice operations via even shifts, and the dictionary with inversion for the right order.
  • Nothing here uses a choice principle: the shift K is not chosen but any sufficiently large one is used, and the formulas are proved independent of it.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources