Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Leverage-score row sampling embeds the column space

Statement

Let Q∈Kn×d, d≥1, have orthonormal columns, and let ℓi=∥ei∗Q∥22. Let π be a probability vector with πi≥βℓi/d for 0<β≤1, and draw S by With-replacement leverage-score row sampling and rescaling with replacement. For 0<ε,δ<1, if

m≥8dβε2log⁡(2dδ),

then with probability at least 1−δ,

∥Q∗S∗SQ−Id∥2≤ε.

Equivalently, S is an ε-subspace embedding for Ran⁡(Q). In the usual confidence range 0<δ≤1/2, the simpler sufficient condition

m≥16dβε2log⁡(dδ)

follows. For a matrix A of rank d, any orthonormal basis Q of Ran⁡(A) gives the corresponding embedding guarantee on Ran⁡(A).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An orthonormal Q, the stated sampling probabilities and parameters, and the with-replacement sketch draw.

[F1]

The leverage scores are basis-independent, sum to d, and satisfy 0≤ℓi≤1 (Row leverage scores of a finite-dimensional subspace, Leverage scores are basis-independent and sum to the dimension).

[F2]

Each draw independently samples row i with probability πi and puts ei∗/mπi in the corresponding row; a zero-probability row has zero leverage and is not sampled (With-replacement leverage-score row sampling and rescaling).

[F3]

If independent centered Hermitian matrices Bj satisfy ∥Bj∥2≤R and ∥EBj2∥2≤v, then Pr⁡{∥∑j=1mBj∥2>2mv a+2Ra/3}≤2de−a for every a>0 (Bounded independent matrix Bernstein bound from the trace exponential).

[F4]

An ε-embedding has the squared-norm inequality on every vector of the specified subspace (Oblivious squared-norm subspace embeddings).

[F5]

For Hermitian matrices, write X⪯Y when v∗(Y−X)v≥0 for every vector v; the operator norm is max⁡∥v∥2=1∥Mv∥2 on a nonzero finite-dimensional domain (The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||).

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F1F2algebra

Write zi=Q∗ei∈Kd, so ∥zi∥22=ℓi. For draw j, let Jj be its sampled index and define Yj=zJjzJj∗/πJj. By [F2], the Yj are independent and EYj=∑i:πi>0zizi∗=Q∗Q=Id; terms with πi=0 have zi=0 by [F1] and contribute zero.

2.1F1step 1.1F3algebra

Put R=d/β≥1 and Bj=Yj−Id. The rank-one identity (zizi∗)2=ℓizizi∗ and πi≥βℓi/d give ∥Yj∥2=ℓJj/πJj≤R and Yj2⪯RYj. Thus ∥Bj∥2≤max⁡(1,R−1)≤R, EBj=0, and 0⪯EBj2=EYj2−Id⪯(R−1)Id⪯RId. Hence [F3] applies with both bounds equal to R.

3.1F3step 2.1givenalgebra

Set a=log⁡(2d/δ). By [F3], Pr⁡{∥∑j=1mBj∥2>2mRa+2Ra/3}≤2de−a=δ. Under the first sample-size condition, mε2≥8Ra, so 2mRa≤mε/2. Also mε/2≥4Ra/ε≥2Ra/3, since 0<ε<1. Thus the Bernstein threshold is at most mε.

4.1F2F4F5F6step 2.1step 3.1algebra

From the sampled-row definition in [F2], Q∗S∗SQ=m−1∑jYj, so Q∗S∗SQ−Id=m−1∑jBj. Step 2.1 therefore proves ∥Q∗S∗SQ−Id∥2≤ε with probability at least 1−δ. For nonzero y, [F5] and [F6] imply ∣y∗(Q∗S∗SQ−Id)y∣≤∥y∥2∥(Q∗S∗SQ−Id)y∥2≤ε∥y∥22; the same holds for zero y. Thus (1−ε)∥y∥22≤∥SQy∥22≤(1+ε)∥y∥22, and because Q is an isometry onto its range, this is the embedding property in [F4].

5.1givenstep 4.1algebra∎

If 0<δ≤1/2 and d≥1, then d/δ≥2, hence log⁡(2d/δ)=log⁡(d/δ)+log⁡2≤2log⁡(d/δ). Therefore the second stated sample-size condition implies the first. For any rank-d matrix A, its range is Ran⁡(Q), so the same embedding statement applies to A's column space.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources