How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be the connected simply connected complex semisimple affine algebraic group with Borel and Weyl group of Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety and Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates, and let be a simple root with minimal parabolic , root subgroup and Weyl subgroup as in Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root. Let and be the orbit maps of Projective orbit constructions for G/B and G/P_alpha. Then:
(i) the induced map , , is a surjective morphism of varieties, well defined because , and its fibre over is canonically the coset space , which is in the two-chart description , with of Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root;
(ii) is a Zariski-locally trivial fibre bundle with fibre : over each single -translate of the open torsor chart from Zariski sections of Borel and minimal-parabolic orbit maps, it becomes the projection . These translates cover and admit a finite subcover. In the rank-one case , the base is a point and is the unique map from to that point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the group , its Borel , the simple root , the minimal parabolic , the orbit maps , and the closed orbits , .
is a closed connected subgroup containing and with , and ; the coset space is described by the two affine charts and glued by . (Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root)
The stabilizer of in is , the stabilizer of is , and the fibres of and are exactly the right cosets of respectively ; both orbit maps are surjective onto the closed orbits , , which are smooth projective of dimensions and . (Projective orbit constructions for G/B and G/P_alpha)
The orbit map is a Zariski-locally trivial right -torsor. Its open chart satisfies , and the single -translates cover , with the product torsor transported to each translate. Likewise is a right -torsor and represents the fppf sheaf quotient . (Zariski sections of Borel and minimal-parabolic orbit maps)
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
The inclusion makes well defined on closed points, and is surjective by [F2]. It is a morphism: by [F3] a Zariski cover of admits sections of the -torsor , so on each chart the proposed map is the composite of a section into with the morphism ; the expressions agree on overlaps because two sections differ by right multiplication by a -valued function and . The local morphisms glue to , and as morphisms.
Fix a point . Since by [F2], the fibre of is the image of under . The quotient description in [F3], after choosing the displayed , identifies this fibre as a scheme with . By [F1] the latter fppf quotient is with charts , and transition .
Local triviality follows by base change of the -torsor. Let . The product chart of [F3] identifies with , equivariantly for right . Quotienting this identity by the right subgroup gives as fppf sheaves and hence as schemes by [F1] and [F3]. Under this identification is the projection to . For every , left translation carries the entire diagram to the single open translate and gives the same product description. These translates cover by [F3], and projectivity makes a finite subcover available.
The rank-one case. If then and is a single point while is by [F1] and [F2]; the map is then the unique morphism , which is the trivial -bundle over its one-point base, and both assertions hold without any local section.
Steps 1.1–1.2 prove (i), and step 2.1 proves (ii); step 2.2 checks the rank-one endpoint. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through [F1]–[F3] and declared in [F4].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michel Brion, Lectures on the Geometry of Flag Varieties (standard reference, not scraped)