Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be the connected simply connected complex semisimple affine algebraic group with Borel B=T⋉U and Weyl group W of Complex semisimple algebraic group, Borel, and flag variety and Borel, opposite unipotent groups and root coordinates, and let α be a simple root with minimal parabolic Pα=B⊔BnαB, root subgroup U−α and Weyl subgroup {1,sα} as in Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root. Let πB:G→XB and πα:G→Xα be the orbit maps of Projective orbit constructions for G/B and G/P_alpha. Then:

(i) the induced map f:XB→Xα, g[vB]↦g[vα], is a surjective morphism of varieties, well defined because B⊆Pα, and its fibre over g[vα] is canonically the coset space Pα/B, which is P1 in the two-chart description z↦u−α(z)B, t↦uα(t)nαB with t=z−1 of Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root;

(ii) f is a Zariski-locally trivial fibre bundle with fibre P1: over each single G-translate gV of the open torsor chart V=σα(Uα−)⊆Xα from Zariski sections of Borel and minimal-parabolic orbit maps, it becomes the projection gV×P1→gV. These translates cover Xα and admit a finite subcover. In the rank-one case G=Pα, the base is a point and f is the unique map from P1 to that point.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the group G, its Borel B, the simple root α, the minimal parabolic Pα, the orbit maps πB, πα and the closed orbits XB, Xα.

[F1]

Pα is a closed connected subgroup containing B and U−α with Pα=B⊔BnαB, Lie⁡Pα=b⊕g−α and dim⁡Pα=dim⁡B+1; the coset space Pα/B is described by the two affine charts z↦u−α(z)B and t↦uα(t)nαB glued by t=z−1. (Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root)

[F2]

The stabilizer of [vB] in G is B, the stabilizer of [vα] is Pα, and the fibres of πB and πα are exactly the right cosets of B respectively Pα; both orbit maps are surjective onto the closed orbits XB=πB(G), Xα=πα(G), which are smooth projective of dimensions ∣Φ+∣ and ∣Φ+∣−1. (Projective orbit constructions for G/B and G/P_alpha)

[F3]

The orbit map πα:G→Xα is a Zariski-locally trivial right Pα-torsor. Its open chart V=σα(Uα−) satisfies πα−1(V)≅V×Pα, and the single G-translates gV cover Xα, with the product torsor transported to each translate. Likewise πB is a right B-torsor and represents the fppf sheaf quotient G/B. (Zariski sections of Borel and minimal-parabolic orbit maps)

[F4]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3construct

The inclusion B⊆Pα makes g[vB]↦g[vα] well defined on closed points, and πα is surjective by [F2]. It is a morphism: by [F3] a Zariski cover of XB admits sections of the B-torsor πB, so on each chart the proposed map is the composite of a section into G with the morphism πα; the expressions agree on overlaps because two sections differ by right multiplication by a B-valued function and B⊆Pα. The local morphisms glue to f, and f∘πB=πα as morphisms.

1.2F1F2F3

Fix a point y=g[vα]∈Xα. Since πα−1(y)=gPα by [F2], the fibre of f is the image of gPα under πB. The quotient description in [F3], after choosing the displayed g, identifies this fibre as a scheme with Pα/B. By [F1] the latter fppf quotient is P1 with charts z↦u−α(z)B, t↦uα(t)nαB and transition t=z−1.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2construct

Local triviality follows by base change of the Pα-torsor. Let V=σα(Uα−). The product chart of [F3] identifies πα−1(V) with V×Pα, equivariantly for right Pα. Quotienting this identity by the right subgroup B gives f−1(V)≅(V×Pα)/B≅V×(Pα/B)≅V×P1 as fppf sheaves and hence as schemes by [F1] and [F3]. Under this identification f is the projection to V. For every g∈G, left translation carries the entire diagram to the single open translate gV and gives the same product description. These translates cover Xα by [F3], and projectivity makes a finite subcover available.

2.2F1F2step 1.2

The rank-one case. If G=Pα then B⊆Pα=G and Xα=G/Pα is a single point while XB=G/B=Pα/B is P1 by [F1] and [F2]; the map f is then the unique morphism P1→{pt}, which is the trivial P1-bundle over its one-point base, and both assertions hold without any local section.

3.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2discharge-construct∎

Steps 1.1–1.2 prove (i), and step 2.1 proves (ii); step 2.2 checks the rank-one endpoint. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through [F1]–[F3] and declared in [F4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources