How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Module categories have enough projectives
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every ring , the abelian category has enough projectives.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A ring .
Every left -module is a quotient of a free left -module (Every module is a quotient of a free module).
Under the Axiom of Choice, free modules are projective (Equivalent characterizations of projective modules).
Having enough projectives means admitting a projective epimorphism onto every object (A category with enough projectives and with enough injectives).
Proof
Let be a left -module. By [L1], the canonical free module admits a surjection .
Under the Axiom of Choice, [L2] makes projective. So admits a projective epimorphism from step 1.1.
Since was arbitrary, [L3] shows that has enough projectives.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Kleshchev, Lectures on Abstract Algebra for Graduate Students, Sections 3.14 and 3.15 (standard reference, not scraped)