How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse
Statement
For every matrix over or , there exists a unique matrix satisfying the four Penrose equations of The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse as the solution of the four Penrose equations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A matrix with .
admits a singular value decomposition with and unitary and diagonal with the nonzero singular values on the diagonal (Every linear map between finite-dimensional real or complex inner product spaces admits a singular value decomposition).
The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse is defined by the four Penrose equations (The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse as the solution of the four Penrose equations).
Proof
By [L1], after choosing singular values one may write
Define Then , , and the two products and are diagonal with only and on the diagonal, hence are self-adjoint.
Multiplying the relations of step 2.1 by the unitary factors and shows Thus is a Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse of in the sense of [L2].
Let be any other Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse of , and put . Then the same unitary transport used in step 3.1 gives with and self-adjoint.
Write where . From one gets , hence . Because is self-adjoint, its upper-right block satisfies , so . Because is self-adjoint, its lower-left block satisfies , so . With these identities, the equation reduces to so . Hence and therefore .
Step 3.1 gives existence and step 5.1 gives uniqueness, so every finite real or complex matrix has a unique Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse.
Depends on
Used by
- The family diag(1,t) shows that pseudoinversion is not continuous across rank loss Counterexample
- A diagonal rank-deficient matrix makes A^+, AA^+, and A^+A completely explicit Example
- For arbitrary matrices, (AB)^+=B^+A^+ False statement
- If A has full column rank, then A^+=(A^*A)⁻¹A^* Proposition
- Pseudoinversion is involutive, commutes with adjoints, and is equivariant under unitary left and right factors Proposition
- AA^+ and A^+A are the orthogonal projections onto imA and imA^* Theorem
- As λ↓0, the Tikhonov minimisers converge to the Moore--Penrose solution A^+b Theorem
- The Moore--Penrose pseudoinverse is continuous on each fixed-rank stratum and is not continuous across rank loss Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Roger Penrose, A generalized inverse for matrices (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Stuart and Jochen Voss, Matrix Analysis and Algorithms (standard reference, not scraped)