Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

MUSCL/minmod face states are second order on smooth monotone data

Statement

Let u∈C2 on a neighborhood of a cell and its two neighbors, and suppose ∣u′(x)∣≥c>0 there. Let Uj be the averages of u over uniform cells of width h, centered at xj=x0+jh. For sufficiently small h, the MUSCL/minmod face states of Finite-volume MUSCL, nodal ENO2 and WENO5 reconstruction conventions satisfy ∣Ui+hsi/2−u(xi+h/2)∣≤Ch2,∣Ui−hsi/2−u(xi−h/2)∣≤Ch2, where C depends only on c and a bound for ∣u′′∣ on the stated neighborhood.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated smoothness and nonvanishing derivative, uniform cell averages, and minmod MUSCL slopes.

[F1]

Finite-volume MUSCL, nodal ENO2 and WENO5 reconstruction conventions: hsi=minmod⁡(Ui−Ui−1,Ui+1−Ui) and the two face states are Ui±hsi/2.

[F2]

A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound: with ∣u′′∣≤M2, the degree-one Taylor remainder at distance r is bounded by M2∣r∣2/2.

Proof

1.1givenF2algebra

Let M2=sup⁡∣u′′∣ on the cell and its neighbors. Applying [F2] about xi and averaging over the symmetric central cell cancels the linear term, giving ∣Ui−u(xi)∣≤M2h2/24. Applying [F2] at xi to the neighboring centers and using the same cell-average estimate gives Ui−Ui−1=hu′(xi)+O(M2h2) and Ui+1−Ui=hu′(xi)+O(M2h2).

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Because ∣u′(xi)∣≥c, both increments in step 1.1 have the same nonzero sign for all sufficiently small h. Minmod selects one of them, and either equals hu′(xi)+O(M2h2); hence hsi=hu′(xi)+O(M2h2).

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

By step 1.1 and step 2.1, Ui+hsi/2=u(xi)+hu′(xi)/2+O(M2h2). Applying [F2] at distance h/2 gives u(xi+h/2)=u(xi)+hu′(xi)/2+O(M2h2), so subtraction proves the right-face estimate. The same calculation with −h/2 proves the left-face estimate.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources